Tag Archive for OBE

Strange Arms at OoBE

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 3657 3454 1767 1486
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-10-13
Time: 8.45 p.m. to 9.48 p.m.
Duration: 63 minutes
Pages: 9

What can you find out when you look at people’s experiences of consciousness? The “Monroe Institute: CHEC Units” session already gave a first glimpse . Now, however, the opportunity arose for an even more special target, which comes directly from an experience report of the Thetawaves forum:

Thetawaves-Forum: Fremde Arme (german)

The other day, after re-entering the body, I had a situation that seriously gave me pause. At that point in time, I was already completely locked into the physical body with my non-physical body – almost physically awake. Indeed, I suddenly felt for a few seconds how other non-physical arms pushed their way from behind through my physical arms … so into my physical body, so to speak, from behind through the shoulders and into the fingers …. kind of like pushing your arms into latex gloves in an isolation chamber. The arms felt very cold and strange (lifeless) … that was damn scary and I wonder what the intention is and from whom … Especially this unspeakable coldness of the arms shocked me. That might sound a bit paranoid, but it was really very intense and real …

The target cue:

*Translation: “Describe Wendulins Experience that he reported in the Thetawaves-Forum in the following post…”

As is usual with such targets, the first stages showed a tangle of (often indefinable) colors and surfaces. The AIs of stage 1 expressed themselves as follows: “Prison feeling – contrast (free / walled in) – dead end – like course”

In stage 2 these AIs were shown: “Artificial – simulated – sadly authentic and not authentic” . The viewer felt that part of the target was “real” and another part was “fake”. What that could mean later became clearer.

In stage 3 , the viewer drew a strange scene with a person in the center. Here he felt it was half “real + sad” and half “fake + happy”:

So far it was only pretty abstract data (which is typical with such targets).

Of course, it gets more interesting in stage 4. The aesthetical impacts (AIs) of the viewer to the target were “One side is real (the hollow one), the other side is like a kind of hologram / illusion” . With the emotional impacts (EIs) he then perceived two separate persons / entities. Person 1 (P1) felt something like “shock cold, steadfastness, assertion” and appeared “unimpressed” . Person 2 (P2), on the other hand, appeared “hardened, used, waiting” and “bored” . As ITs of the target there was “bring it down, look at it, project” and“Create ideal / demonstrate”. The viewer’s overall conclusion about the situation was:

“Like shortly before the solution”
“Something very small is missing”

In stage 6 we then looked at the aspect “Something is missing” more precisely. We asked what was missing and it was “Idea, sparkling thought, blocked” . Here it became even clearer that only a tiny little thing is missing to something. We then continued with a person perception in order to take a closer look at the two individuals (P1 and P2) occurring in the target.

Investigation and sketching of P1 and its activities (remarkable; the estimated age at 253 years – does that relate to the energy body or soul part?). P1 is on a kind of projection surface that she apparently “operates”.

Here now also P2, after which the “relationship” between P1 and P2 was also examined.

Essentially it came out that P1 tries to break through a kind of wall or blockade, but for which the said “little thing” is still missing. P2, on the other hand, waits on the “other side” and acts like an exam taker or “representative of the supervisory authority”. Obviously, this seems to be a familiar thing for P2, because they just “sit” there, bored and waiting. More precisely, P2 was waiting for a “result from P1”. A guide who should help, but who can only contribute once the OoBe practitioner has achieved the necessary “little thing”?

But how do you explain the aspect of the “strange arms” from the experience report? In fact, no direct contact or touch between P1 and P2 was visible during the session. On the contrary: It all pointed to a spatial / dimensional separation. The viewer developed its own theory afterwards (click for full screen):

So maybe it wasn’t a guide at all, and the experiencer practically “groped himself”? Again one of countless and still emerging puzzles from metaphysical realms …

Summary: An abstract, but interesting session on an experience on the border between wakefulness and sleep. The interpretation of the processes arises from comparison experiences that were made in this state. The symbolism with some kind of projection surface appears more often with such targets. Sessions on dreams also go in the same direction, although further sessions are required in order to be able to accept recurring patterns.

This also opens up the possibility of interesting RV projects in connection with OoBE-experiments: How are the experiences made with the respective techniques or approaches? Are there such things as recognizable constants, or does the data composition remain purely subjective? Can one contribute RV as a verification aid or additional data acquisition? Perhaps a combined OoBE / RV experiment can be carried out in the Thetawaves community in the future …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Monroe Institute: CHEC-Units

Category: Places / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 9475 2145 8522 2475
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-04-21
Time: 11.25 p.m. to 00.20 a.m.
Duration: 55 minutes
Pages: 8

Since my interest in consciousness phenomena (in addition to remote viewing) is mainly in the area of ​​out-of-body experience, I got the following target to see some time ago:

This is a so-called “CHEC-Unit” (controlled holistic environmental chamber), which is used at the Monroe Institute in seminars to support out-of-body experiences and other states of consciousness. These chambers almost completely shield sensory stimuli and are equipped with headphones for Hemi Sync recordings for further support, so that one can fully concentrate on achieving the desired state of consciousness. Here is a video explaining such a chamber:

These chambers are regularly in use, as seminars (like Gateway) are constantly taking place at the Monroe Institute, which are composed of small groups. When looking at this target, it came to very interesting impressions: It was actually a group that was working in these chambers on a common goal, and was supported by some entities. Here is the explanation of the session:

The first stages brought data that matched the chamber itself. It felt like I was in a cramped, rectangular room. But suddenly a kind of “channel” opened up to the upper right, which looked like a short tunnel and simply went through the walls:

CHEC-Unit (S3)

Stage 3 – Impression of the cramped chamber (left) with the tunnel suddenly appearing (right), and unambiguous AIs (… “opens like infinite” … “amazing, baffled” … “arouses curiosity” …).

At the end of the tunnel, I had the impression of a kind of door that was opened, and behind it was something like “colorful infinity” (I can’t put it any other way). Perhaps as if you were stepping out of a narrow airlock into immeasurable space, only that no boundaries or fixed reference points were perceptible here. The impressions were experienced by a group of individuals, of whom my first impression at stage 4 was:

“Group of EIs (emotional impacts) at the lower end – looking euphorically into the imposing – neutral hysteria”

I then examined the term “neutral hysteria” more precisely in stage 6 using a relational diagram, and recognized that the cause of this was “hope”, “open” and “what was impressive above” . At that moment I also noticed the opening of the aforementioned “door” and sketched it.

Then my monitor let me examine how the door was opened. The opening had something to do with the group of individuals (seminar participants?) And was partly caused by them. Now we asked what the other part was, which is also causing it, and the impressions came “Help from outside – powerful, great” . We examined the impression “help from outside” and asked about the intention, whereupon the impressions “benevolent – positive attention – help – enable” came about.

At that moment I also noticed that the help was coming from some highly developed, imposing entities, which more or less helped to open the “door” in both directions. These entities made a very pleasant and sublime impression. A company that you can enjoy through and through (as long as you don’t focus on it, like some ungrounded contemporaries in these areas 😉 ). Then we asked whether the group of individuals (G1) could do this alone, which was answered in the affirmative. On the part of the perceived entities, it was actually only a matter of assistance, and not an unconditional requirement.

Finally, we examined the IT “movement – then shoot in one direction” , which appeared in stage 4. We asked about the intention or the purpose, and I got the impressions “brighten – become clear – knowledge – reveal / Aha! -Effect” . Then the session ended with impressive conclusion AIs:


And here again especially for you as an incredibly selfless luxury service; a transcribed (and translated) version of the relational diagrams from stage 6 (since right-brained writing is sometimes hardly legible :D):


Summary:  A very interesting experience, the experience of other states of consciousness, so to speak from “outside”, without having to go out of the body, for example. And another example, which not only the physical world can be viewed, but also that which is normally ascribed to the metaphysical realm and which so far can only be experienced through self-experience. Furthermore, it is a good indication that such processes actually take place in the seminars at the Monroe Institute, and that it is not based on group suggestion or imagination (as poorly informed skeptics sometimes claim). Interesting side aspect: The “door” that appeared in the session was drawn by another viewer exactly like this in a session on a similar topic. Possibly an archetypal symbolism.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag