Tag Archive for Locations

Journey to the Center of the Earth

In the paranormal scene there is a well-known and controversial topic: Is the earth hollow inside? And if so, are there even life / civilizations there?

Category: Places
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 5568 2985 4984 7906
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2013-04-14
Time: 9:09 p.m. – 9:57 p.m.
Duration: 48 minutes
Pages: 15

We wanted to know more about it, and went on an extrasensory short trip across the interior of the earth. What did we expect there? A huge cavity, with continents on the inside of the earth’s shell and the central sun in the middle? Or a dense environment with markedly high temperatures (as in the official theory)?

RV - Erdinneres


Since this topic may be contaminated with some collective assumptions, I chose the Target cue as neutral as possible:

RV - Erdinneres - Target

*Translation: “Describe the Enviroment below your feet, beginning with 10km depth! (O1 = 100km, O2 = 2000km, O3 = 5000km, O4 = 6250km)”

The journey should begin for the viewer “10 km under his feet”, and then lead through instructions to move to coded locations (O1, O2, O3, O4) through different depths of the earth’s interior. The lowest point (O4) corresponds roughly to the area of ​​the theoretical core of the earth (at approx. 12800 km diameter of the earth).

10km underground

The first three stages showed unspectacular data, with some suggesting a rocky environment. A kind of fluid vein was also perceived with the AUL “water”. It was interesting that the viewer had the impression of an artificial intervention in stage 4. He found this intervention inappropriate, banal and arrogant. In a further analysis from stage 6 on , impressions such as “align”, “make flat”, “aesthetics”, “luxury” and “bring into shape” were added. Could he have come across the remains of a mine tunnel somewhere between the surface and 10km depth? Whereby something would probably have to be higher than 10km, since that would be excessively deep.

At a depth of 100km

Now it was time to go into the more interesting depths, starting with 100km. There the viewer described the surface impressions as “clunky”, “unstable”, “rough” and “wet”. The colors were “red-brown”, “gray”, “pale green” and “silver” (similar to before at a depth of 10 km). The temperatures seemed to be getting warmer here, and the dimensions were perceived as “geometric” and like “falling terrain”. The AIs were “I don’t like it” and “reminds me of an abandoned industrial site”.

Jump to 2000km depth

We still had a long (or deep) way to go, so we went straight to the next depth. This time we made a big jump to 2000km depth. After the ideogram, the viewer immediately got the impressions “warm” and “thick air”, even before anything was even categorically queried. Smooth and rounded impressions then dominated the surfaces. The dominant color impression was a lot of brown, but there were also traces of blue hues. The temperatures were now felt separately as “muggy”, “warm” and “like thick air”. The viewer could only describe the dimensional impressions as “cramped”.

5000km inside the Earth

The next jump was 5000km deep, more than twice as deep as the previous one, and closer to the center of the earth than to the surface. Interestingly, the first impression the viewer got here was “fresh” and “smooth”. The surfaces were then “smooth”, “slippery”, “hard”, “immobile” and “firm”. The colors were “foggy”, “milklike tone”, “blue-gray light” and were generally perceived as “cold light colors”. The viewer perceived the temperatures as “fresh” and “clear, but expansive”. As an AI he still felt a sense of freedom. This layer still seemed to be dense or opaque, but apparently not as uncomfortable as the previous layers. The surroundings seemed to shine by themselves in their brightness, which could indicate energized, continuous fluid (magma?). It is interestingthat the colors were perceived as bluish-white.

Near the center at a depth of 6250km

The end of the line was now at a depth of 6250km, which, according to the official assumption, should already be within the Earth’s core. There were surface impressions such as “dry-slimy” and the colors “gray”, “yellow-pale” and “brown-pale”. The temperatures were perceived as “warm” and “cold” with extreme differences. The dimensional impression was “round” and “large”. As AOL/S, the viewer compared the environment with a multi-layered shoe sole. The overall impression was “exotic”. In addition, there were intangibles of the processes there: “sucking in”, “turning over” and “negative pressure”. Apparently the viewer got the physical processes in the target area. For the viewer it was like a constant exchange of extremely different components, which he also sketched on the occasion:

RV - Erdinneres - Austausch

Temperature measurement

On the next page I had spontaneous measurements carried out on the temperatures of the visited locations. The scale began at -270°C (almost the absolute, physical zero point) and went up to 10,000°C. The results of the measurement were shown as follows:

RV - Erdinneres - Temperaturen

The temperatures seem to rise gradually the lower you go. An interesting exception was the core area at 6250km depth, where they again appeared to be a little lower than at 5000km depth. With such extreme temperature ranges and large dimension scales, inaccuracies are a well-known phenomenon. But still it is interesting how close the impressions come to the official temperature assumptions for the different zones of the earth’s interior. Using the measurement, you can roughly say:

100km depth = approx. 1000°C
2000km depth = approx. 2500°C
5000km depth = approx. 7000°C
6250km depth = approx. 4500°C

Because of the inaccuracies mentioned, it is not possible to say exactly whether it is really significantly cooler in the core than in the “briefly” area above. However, it again fits the perceptions of the viewer that extremely warm and cold temperatures occur there in an exchange process. If we again assume the official structure of the earth’s interior, the temperature ranges come together well overall. That it usually gets warmer the deeper you go, indications from boreholes over 10km deep, at which the temperatures already went in the direction of 190°C, suggest. A variant of the hollow earth theory assumes that there is actually a layer of hot magma between the earth’s crust and the hollow inner world, but that underneath (after more than 1000km) there should be more or less “free sky”.Here, however, we only got dense and opaque impressions from the viewer, and temperatures hostile to life, if the dimensioning scales can be trusted in this case.

Finally, I let the viewer draw the structures in their entirety at a depth of 6250km, which then turned out to be:

RV - Erdinneres - Mittelpunkt

The impressions “sultry” and “very hot” came spontaneously. Then “too much info” (apparently too large a target area?), And “known” but “new” at the same time, which the viewer found implausible for itself. Structurally, he still had the impression that it was “rocky” and “onion-like” (built up in layers like an onion). An indication of the assumption that the Earth has a solid, compressed core. At the end there was still the strong impression “makes a headache”, which according to the viewer was definitely due to the conditions in the target area. We already know similar AI phenomena from strong, bi-local impressions from target areas with high ambient pressure (e.g. deep sea).

Summary: The data go in the direction of the official theories about the structure of the Earth’s interior. Even if there were a few surprises, they contradict the hollow world-view of a life-friendly environment and a central sun. This is especially true for the rather hostile to life-temperature ranges and pressures, which the viewer also found uncomfortable. A long time ago I had a newcomer see the inside of the earth, but only at a depth of 5000km. He found it mainly tight and overwhelming. But we did not go into more detail at the time.

But does that mean the rejection of underground life or even civilizations? Not necessarily, because one could well imagine large cavities in the earth’s crust that house entire cities. But that would probably not be very low (5-10km), as the temperatures rise quite quickly. And from a technological point of view, you would have to have a lot to do with it to keep such a civilization alive down there. But these are targets for other sessions, and it should be much more difficult to formulate neutral taskings (unless you might have a geographical reference point or approximate coordinates).

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Gliese 581c

Category: Astronomy
Number of viewers: 2
Number of sessions: 2

Exoplanets are certainly one of the most popular remote viewing targets. Since you cannot expect close-ups of it in the foreseeable future (with current, official propulsion methods, a probe would need approx. 500 years to the nearest solar system), it is probably the only standardized method to take a closer look at these distant worlds. Out-of-body experiences also seem to be a possibility, but there it often fails due to targeting and navigation (and it is not available to everyone “at the push of a button”). Dozens of exoplanets are now known to lie in the habitable zone of their star. Habitale zone means that water is neither permanently frozen nor completely evaporated, and where biological life could exist as we know it so far.

Our first viewed exoplanet was Gliese 581c, which was the hottest candidate for habitability at the time. It is about 20.4 light years away from Earth and orbits the red dwarf star Gliese 581. The planet is estimated to be a little more than twice the size of the earth, and the surface gravity to be 2.2g (earth = 1.0g).

Gliese 581c (künstlerische Darstellung)

Artist’s impression of Gliese 581c (Source: Wikipedia)


Viewer # 1 (Stefan Franke)

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 5874 2939 5428 4987
Date: December 22, 2011
Time: 12:26 am to 1:31 am
Duration: 65 minutes
Pages: 8

The first session aimed (rather imprecisely) at describing the surface of the planet. At that time we weren’t that trained in moving instructions. The target formulation for the session was:

“Describe the area around the surface of the exoplanet whose human name is Gliese 581c!”

In stage 1 , two interesting impressions appeared. On the one hand, a movement was noticeable, which expressed itself in an associative way like a conveyor belt running past:

In later sessions on other planets (also known ones) it turned out that this symbolism appeared often in stage 1, and a perception of the planet’s own rotation or orbit seems to be. In the case of low data density, physical impressions should not be associated too literally, otherwise they will be used in technical systems. Another interesting impression was the fairly clear perception of the following structure:

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 1) - Kristallblume

It stood out from the surface and had the colors blue, white and black. The structure gave the impression of a huddled crystal or ice formation, which one could call a “crystal flower” or “crystal bulb” (as we know it from rock crystals). The AIs for stage 1 were “interesting” and “a bit artistic” .

Stage 2 brought some interesting basic data that indicated a rather dim, rough, stony-dusty and above all cold landscape. The cold was quite noticeable, but this could still be in the survivable range (we had not tried a special measurement). But it felt like it was probably below 0 ° C. Later came the AOL “ice cream”The dimness of the surroundings could be explained by the fact that the star Gliese 581 is a red dwarf. But of course you could have ended up on the night side if there was something interesting for the subconscious of the viewer. The stage 2 AIs were “dark” and “abandoned” .

In stage 3 and 4 then, in addition to aspects of the surface, some interesting structures seemed to emerge that artificially wigged. Of course, we took a closer look at the structures. The feeling now seemed more like in a closed space, which consisted of different, platform-like levels. Most noticeable was that something seemed to be hanging from the ceiling. This object looked technological and resembled an oversized triode or radio tube turned upside down. We examined it further in Stage 6 . It seemed to be dangling from the ceiling on chaotic harnesses:

RV - Gliese581c (Session 1) - Triode

The further impression was that a kind of thin energy or electron beam was emitted at the tip. However, this was more tangible than visible, and could therefore be invisible to the naked eye. The ITs for this were “aim” and “guide” . Related ITs in the environment seemed to be “sizzling” , “changing” and “keeping” . These related to any “beams” or “girders” (elongated parts) that were inserted somewhere down there and processed by this device. The whole thing now seemed like an industrial process.

Of course, the monitor now also allows people to be perceived if artificial structures are already suspected to appear on an exoplanet. 2-3 people were noticeable on site, who the EIs radiated “a little excited” , “tired” and “amused” . However, they didn’t seem to notice the viewer (which can be different in alien sessions). The monitor got a bit nervous anyway and only let the viewer describe roughly one of the people. In terms of appearance, “rather small” , “slim” and, strangely enough, “angular”as data. It felt as if the people had an almost square torso, or such angular clothing. The perceived height of the person was between 1.20m and 1.50m (this could be plausible in view of the suspected 2.2g gravity, if these beings are at home there). The gender was “female” , although the gender information (also for people) is often unreliable. The colors of the person were ultimately expressed in “light gray” and “white-greenish patterned”. It is unclear whether this refers to skin color or clothing (if any). The first, rather fleeting session on Gliese 581c ended there.

Summary: Some interesting aspects appeared to have been viewed. Unfortunately, the session was broken off when it got exciting, and the viewer / monitor was not yet familiar with the use of the stage 6 tools. The first impressions of the landscape and the triode-like device came most clearly. For the landscape, a summary sketch (including “crystal flower”) was created:

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 1) - Landschaft

Particularly noteworthy are the rather flat-looking, low rock plateaus. This could also be an indication of the high gravity. On Mars, for example, there are also much higher geological structures than on Earth (see Mount Everest ~ 9km vs. Olympus Mons ~ 25km). In addition to the rather dim mood, the viewer also recognized something dark, ring-shaped in the sky. It is unclear whether this is a planetary ring, as the structure was barely noticeable. Overall, Gliese 581c looked to the viewer as a rough, cold, but somehow atmospheric environment.


Viewer # 2 (Benny Pamp)

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 4303 6461 2272 2617
Date: /2012-02-26
Time: 7:50 p.m. to 8:50 p.m.
Duration: 60 minutes
Pages: 7

The second session took place under the Target premise of describing the most interesting natural formation on the planet. On the one hand, it should be more targeted than the first target, and on the other hand it should work towards a possible verification, since with similar approaches by other taskers / viewers a certain structure on the planet was always viewed (a kind of conspicuous volcanic crater). Therefore the target formulation was now:

“Describe the most interesting, naturally formed formation on the exoplanet Gliese 581c!”

The first stages showed earthy colors and stony, but also soft surfaces. When it comes to smells, the AOL/S “Like chalk” is perhaps interesting. The temperatures were perceived as “muggy” and “pulling down”. In terms of dimensions, the target looked quite complex and graduated. There seemed to be some kind of depression to the right, and there were structures of some sort around. An interesting AI at the end of stage 2 was “I don’t belong there NOW” . In the following stage 3 the viewer now drew a complex environment that seemed to consist partly of natural landscape and partly of artificial structures:

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - Stufe 3

Particularly noticeable here was a kind of frame, which was built into the recess on the right side, while there was a kind of cliff or overhang on the left. Furthermore, something was noticed above the target, which looked like dense, pressing clouds to the viewer, and looked purple. After all, the viewer has already received impressions from people in the target environment.

The stage 4 now concretised in AIs as “construction site” and “New Feeling” . The EIs were coming from behind , “presenting something openly” and “demonstrating” . In the Ts the viewer noted “heavy thing below” and a “construct with feet”(as it was already indicated in the drawing in stage 3). We marked the latter for a further investigation in stage 6. The ITs finally reinforced the building site feeling: “Dismantle”, “lower”, “bring up”, “relocate”, “mill down” and “a lot of effort” . There we marked the attribute “bring up” for stage 6.

In stage 6 let’s take the most interesting, highlighted aspects from the target one after the other. But first there was a perception of people, since the EIs have been neglected so far and are of course one of the most interesting aspects on a foreign planet. The viewer perceived one person in the main focus (P1), and then another group of people standing further apart (G1), who watched the events around P1 rather passively.

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - Stufe 6 - P1

P1 with face and activity in the target. The person looked blond with a green cast, very light skin color and obviously dirt on the face. In the area of ​​the jaw something seemed to be attached that looked artificial and angular (respiratory mask?).

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - G1

The group of people standing further away (G1) only watched passively what was happening around P1.

The events around P1 were described in terms of AI as “something went wrong” , “strained” and “panic and reason alternate” . Apparently the person was involved in a delicate situation. When we investigated this further, it looked as if the “construct with feet” from stages 3 and 4 was threatening to tip over, and P1 tried to hold on to it. That seemed a bit absurd, however, since the construct was much larger than the person. However, in the description of the “mental abilities” of P1 something came out that could sometimes be called psychokinetic ability.

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - P1-Psi

Obviously P1 can “cut aisles” with his mind. We couldn’t find out straight away whether it helped her / him / it (gender could not be determined) to keep the large construct from falling over. Overall, P1 also acted like a kind of foreman, which would go with the EIs “presenting something openly” and “demonstrating” from stage 4. Now we took a detailed look at the group watching:

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - G1 (Details)

The appearance of the individual group members looked very different, almost as if they were different species. The EIs felt the viewer like an unjustifiable and smirking “We do not help P1 because he always leaves us!” . According to the motto “P1 thinks anyway, he can do better.” . Apparently P1 was the only person in the target with the described psi skills. The situation was not devoid of a certain sense of humor, not just from a G1 perspective.😉

Finally there was a detailed sketch of the (unmanageable) “construct with feet” :

RV - Gliese 581c (Session 2) - Stufe 6 - Konstrukt

The construction gave the impression of a derrick from which something spurted out above. Strangely enough, the ITs came up with “bring up” (still plausible), “roof over” and “show something” . Funny detail: P1 bottom left while holding the comparatively oversized tower. Poor, but self-confident, Gliesean foreman “guy” (if he comes from the Gliese 581 system and is not a guest worker) …😀

This was also the right time to “bring up” the IT from stage 4 to examine more closely, which was apparently directly related to the tower construct. When asked “What is being brought up?” , The viewer wrote: “The floor”, “Information”, “distribute / sow” . Some of it contradicts a simple derrick interpretation, or this “promotion” is about aspects that are beyond our technical understanding. Quite an interesting anchor point on which one could set up further detailed sessions. The session ended with the final AI “makes me nervous” and the AOL “mining” .

Summary: Here a location opened up, the rough descriptions of which are similar to the Vulkan sessions of other viewers. Mining and production impressions were also reported. A viewer even had similar EIs as in our session, but interpreted them more as a kind of arena environment with uncomfortable gladiator fights. He says, however, that he could have gotten wrong in AOLs. But this is not excluded in any session (not even in ours) if you cannot get hard feedback on a target. In the meantime, as a monitor, I would have multiple sessions including numerous movement exercises on the same target in order to increase the data density.


Overall summary: These two sessions are of course only a very shy and brief look at a strange world that would have to offer countless interesting details. It is well known that the viewer is mostly drawn to the aspects of a target that his subconscious finds most interesting. Locations on a foreign planet can be circled by exercise (or, in contrast, even entire solar systems “mapped”), but there, too, the scope is still gigantic and the choice of what you ultimately want to see is overwhelming. But do these sessions prove that there is intelligent life on Gliese 581c?

On the basis of the experience with apparently dead, known planets, where often no EIs appear, or those that only seem to come through the space probe present, and to which the EIs of the observing ground crew cling, one could make the rather clear perceptions of people (especially in the second session ) as an indication of intelligent life there. But since we cannot get any hard feedback on this planet (unless a sensational, faster-than-light drive system is announced soon), misinterpretations or AOL-chaining cannot be ruled out. Especially not with just two sessions with slightly different target formulations.

Our modest results may, however, encourage other viewers to take a closer look at this or other interesting exoplanets in order to develop even more clues. Even in the Gliese 581 system itself there are several planet candidates that could be worthwhile in terms of content. But a look into our own solar system is also exciting, as there are enough unsolved puzzles there (e.g. whether there are living oceans under the surface of icy moons such as Europe or Enceladus ). Also the asteroid Ceres or the small ex-planet Pluto one could take a closer look, because in 2015 (if the New Horizons-mission works) we will be able to marvel at close-up photographs for the first time and compare them with the session results.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

The Garden Gnome

Category: Phaenomena
Number of viewers: 2
Number of sessions: 2

At this point I would like to show you that Remote Viewing can also be used very well to expose photographic fakes. This is of course especially interesting in the paranormal area, such as UFOs or ghost photos. While non-authentic ghost photos often can be explained with natural photo effects, deliberate fakes are found primarily in the UFO area.

In our case, however, we choosed a photo that would probably fall into the area “entities” or “mythical creatures”. The starting point was a message board discussion about “orbs” and similar photo-phenomena. One of the users there eventually posted a black and white photo, that supposedly showed a dwarf creature in a nighttime forest. I quickly created a target on it:


Viewer #1

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 13.01.2011 2011/01/13
Time: 8.43pm to 8.51pm
Duration: 8 minutes
Pages: 3

The first, really short session was conducted by a RV beginner up to Stage 3. It should have been her second or third session in total. Interestingly enough, an EI already appeared in Stage 1, namely “regret” . Whether this related to the photographer of the picture? The Stage 1 AI was then “curious” .

In Stage 2 , data matching the surroundings of the picture emerged, with “borky” and “woody” being the most noticeable ones. The AI ​​at the end of this stage now turned into “boring” . According to the sensory impressions, the viewer seemed to be on target.

Stage 3 has now become even clearer as it clearly suggests a forest environment (although for beginners this could of course be an AOL sketch due to the woody impressions, and what they also wrote out as AOLs). There was also something shiny and metallic, which could point to the wire fence in the picture. But there was no trace for a extraordinary aspect in the target, like a metaphysical dwarf. Such extraordinary content usually attracts the unconscious attention of the viewer, as it does with UFO photos or sessions on exoplanets. The AI ​​at the end: “inconsequential”


Viewer # 2

Protocol: TRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2011/01/13
Time: 10.45pm to 11.07pm
Duration: 22 minutes
Pages: 5

The second session was done by a far more experienced viewer. The basic data of the first stages were also in line with the picture here. To shorten the session, the most important aspect of the target was examined directly from Stage 3 (here marked with a [x] in the middle, secondary aspects with [a], [b] and [c]):

Separate detail drawing of the [x] aspect

Stage 4 brought similar AIs, as from the first session: “boring – strange – stupid” . EIs were in the [x] aspect no one to determine, from which one could probably conclude that it is not a living object. Also interesting are the ITs “stand – nature” .

Finally, in Stage 6 , the structure of the [x] aspect was inspected closer. It came back to the IT “stand” and also unspectacular Ts (tangible things / materials) as “clay” and “wood”. Around the structure, there were also the Ts “meadow” and “area” . As a final AI, the viewer found the target as “boring”.

The detailed sketch of the structure clearly shows that it was an exakt hit. The attached data leads to the conclusion that it is not a living entity or an metaphysical entity, but a static object made of ordinary materials. Note also the AOLs “robot”, and especially “garden gnome”.

Summary: After we published the two sessions, the somewhat impressed photographer gave us a photo with a (fairly broken) garden gnome there in the meadows, that has been deliberately photographed in black and white. Would he have admitted it if the sessions had not brought such clear results? In any case, a great example of how Remote Viewing can expose photographic fakes …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Monroe Institute: CHEC-Units

Category: Places / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 9475 2145 8522 2475
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-04-21
Time: 11.25 p.m. to 00.20 a.m.
Duration: 55 minutes
Pages: 8

Since my interest in consciousness phenomena (in addition to remote viewing) is mainly in the area of ​​out-of-body experience, I got the following target to see some time ago:

This is a so-called “CHEC-Unit” (controlled holistic environmental chamber), which is used at the Monroe Institute in seminars to support out-of-body experiences and other states of consciousness. These chambers almost completely shield sensory stimuli and are equipped with headphones for Hemi Sync recordings for further support, so that one can fully concentrate on achieving the desired state of consciousness. Here is a video explaining such a chamber:

These chambers are regularly in use, as seminars (like Gateway) are constantly taking place at the Monroe Institute, which are composed of small groups. When looking at this target, it came to very interesting impressions: It was actually a group that was working in these chambers on a common goal, and was supported by some entities. Here is the explanation of the session:

The first stages brought data that matched the chamber itself. It felt like I was in a cramped, rectangular room. But suddenly a kind of “channel” opened up to the upper right, which looked like a short tunnel and simply went through the walls:

CHEC-Unit (S3)

Stage 3 – Impression of the cramped chamber (left) with the tunnel suddenly appearing (right), and unambiguous AIs (… “opens like infinite” … “amazing, baffled” … “arouses curiosity” …).

At the end of the tunnel, I had the impression of a kind of door that was opened, and behind it was something like “colorful infinity” (I can’t put it any other way). Perhaps as if you were stepping out of a narrow airlock into immeasurable space, only that no boundaries or fixed reference points were perceptible here. The impressions were experienced by a group of individuals, of whom my first impression at stage 4 was:

“Group of EIs (emotional impacts) at the lower end – looking euphorically into the imposing – neutral hysteria”

I then examined the term “neutral hysteria” more precisely in stage 6 using a relational diagram, and recognized that the cause of this was “hope”, “open” and “what was impressive above” . At that moment I also noticed the opening of the aforementioned “door” and sketched it.

Then my monitor let me examine how the door was opened. The opening had something to do with the group of individuals (seminar participants?) And was partly caused by them. Now we asked what the other part was, which is also causing it, and the impressions came “Help from outside – powerful, great” . We examined the impression “help from outside” and asked about the intention, whereupon the impressions “benevolent – positive attention – help – enable” came about.

At that moment I also noticed that the help was coming from some highly developed, imposing entities, which more or less helped to open the “door” in both directions. These entities made a very pleasant and sublime impression. A company that you can enjoy through and through (as long as you don’t focus on it, like some ungrounded contemporaries in these areas 😉 ). Then we asked whether the group of individuals (G1) could do this alone, which was answered in the affirmative. On the part of the perceived entities, it was actually only a matter of assistance, and not an unconditional requirement.

Finally, we examined the IT “movement – then shoot in one direction” , which appeared in stage 4. We asked about the intention or the purpose, and I got the impressions “brighten – become clear – knowledge – reveal / Aha! -Effect” . Then the session ended with impressive conclusion AIs:


And here again especially for you as an incredibly selfless luxury service; a transcribed (and translated) version of the relational diagrams from stage 6 (since right-brained writing is sometimes hardly legible :D):


Summary:  A very interesting experience, the experience of other states of consciousness, so to speak from “outside”, without having to go out of the body, for example. And another example, which not only the physical world can be viewed, but also that which is normally ascribed to the metaphysical realm and which so far can only be experienced through self-experience. Furthermore, it is a good indication that such processes actually take place in the seminars at the Monroe Institute, and that it is not based on group suggestion or imagination (as poorly informed skeptics sometimes claim). Interesting side aspect: The “door” that appeared in the session was drawn by another viewer exactly like this in a session on a similar topic. Possibly an archetypal symbolism.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag