Archive for Consciousness Phenomena

Strange Arms at OoBE

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 3657 3454 1767 1486
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-10-13
Time: 8.45 p.m. to 9.48 p.m.
Duration: 63 minutes
Pages: 9

What can you find out when you look at people’s experiences of consciousness? The “Monroe Institute: CHEC Units” session already gave a first glimpse . Now, however, the opportunity arose for an even more special target, which comes directly from an experience report of the Thetawaves forum:

Thetawaves-Forum: Fremde Arme (german)

The other day, after re-entering the body, I had a situation that seriously gave me pause. At that point in time, I was already completely locked into the physical body with my non-physical body – almost physically awake. Indeed, I suddenly felt for a few seconds how other non-physical arms pushed their way from behind through my physical arms … so into my physical body, so to speak, from behind through the shoulders and into the fingers …. kind of like pushing your arms into latex gloves in an isolation chamber. The arms felt very cold and strange (lifeless) … that was damn scary and I wonder what the intention is and from whom … Especially this unspeakable coldness of the arms shocked me. That might sound a bit paranoid, but it was really very intense and real …

The target cue:


*Translation: “Describe Wendulins Experience that he reported in the Thetawaves-Forum in the following post…”

As is usual with such targets, the first stages showed a tangle of (often indefinable) colors and surfaces. The AIs of stage 1 expressed themselves as follows: “Prison feeling – contrast (free / walled in) – dead end – like course”

In stage 2 these AIs were shown: “Artificial – simulated – sadly authentic and not authentic” . The viewer felt that part of the target was “real” and another part was “fake”. What that could mean later became clearer.

In stage 3 , the viewer drew a strange scene with a person in the center. Here he felt it was half “real + sad” and half “fake + happy”:


So far it was only pretty abstract data (which is typical with such targets).

Of course, it gets more interesting in stage 4. The aesthetical impacts (AIs) of the viewer to the target were “One side is real (the hollow one), the other side is like a kind of hologram / illusion” . With the emotional impacts (EIs) he then perceived two separate persons / entities. Person 1 (P1) felt something like “shock cold, steadfastness, assertion” and appeared “unimpressed” . Person 2 (P2), on the other hand, appeared “hardened, used, waiting” and “bored” . As ITs of the target there was “bring it down, look at it, project” and“Create ideal / demonstrate”. The viewer’s overall conclusion about the situation was:

“Dilemma”
“Like shortly before the solution”
“Something very small is missing”

In stage 6 we then looked at the aspect “Something is missing” more precisely. We asked what was missing and it was “Idea, sparkling thought, blocked” . Here it became even clearer that only a tiny little thing is missing to something. We then continued with a person perception in order to take a closer look at the two individuals (P1 and P2) occurring in the target.

Investigation and sketching of P1 and its activities (remarkable; the estimated age at 253 years – does that relate to the energy body or soul part?). P1 is on a kind of projection surface that she apparently “operates”.

Here now also P2, after which the “relationship” between P1 and P2 was also examined.

Essentially it came out that P1 tries to break through a kind of wall or blockade, but for which the said “little thing” is still missing. P2, on the other hand, waits on the “other side” and acts like an exam taker or “representative of the supervisory authority”. Obviously, this seems to be a familiar thing for P2, because they just “sit” there, bored and waiting. More precisely, P2 was waiting for a “result from P1”. A guide who should help, but who can only contribute once the OoBe practitioner has achieved the necessary “little thing”?

But how do you explain the aspect of the “strange arms” from the experience report? In fact, no direct contact or touch between P1 and P2 was visible during the session. On the contrary: It all pointed to a spatial / dimensional separation. The viewer developed its own theory afterwards (click for full screen):

So maybe it wasn’t a guide at all, and the experiencer practically “groped himself”? Again one of countless and still emerging puzzles from metaphysical realms …

Summary: An abstract, but interesting session on an experience on the border between wakefulness and sleep. The interpretation of the processes arises from comparison experiences that were made in this state. The symbolism with some kind of projection surface appears more often with such targets. Sessions on dreams also go in the same direction, although further sessions are required in order to be able to accept recurring patterns.

This also opens up the possibility of interesting RV projects in connection with OoBE-experiments: How are the experiences made with the respective techniques or approaches? Are there such things as recognizable constants, or does the data composition remain purely subjective? Can one contribute RV as a verification aid or additional data acquisition? Perhaps a combined OoBE / RV experiment can be carried out in the Thetawaves community in the future …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Monroe Institute: CHEC-Units

Category: Places / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 9475 2145 8522 2475
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-04-21
Time: 11.25 p.m. to 00.20 a.m.
Duration: 55 minutes
Pages: 8

Since my interest in consciousness phenomena (in addition to remote viewing) is mainly in the area of ​​out-of-body experience, I got the following target to see some time ago:

This is a so-called “CHEC-Unit” (controlled holistic environmental chamber), which is used at the Monroe Institute in seminars to support out-of-body experiences and other states of consciousness. These chambers almost completely shield sensory stimuli and are equipped with headphones for Hemi Sync recordings for further support, so that one can fully concentrate on achieving the desired state of consciousness. Here is a video explaining such a chamber:

These chambers are regularly in use, as seminars (like Gateway) are constantly taking place at the Monroe Institute, which are composed of small groups. When looking at this target, it came to very interesting impressions: It was actually a group that was working in these chambers on a common goal, and was supported by some entities. Here is the explanation of the session:

The first stages brought data that matched the chamber itself. It felt like I was in a cramped, rectangular room. But suddenly a kind of “channel” opened up to the upper right, which looked like a short tunnel and simply went through the walls:

CHEC-Unit (S3)

Stage 3 – Impression of the cramped chamber (left) with the tunnel suddenly appearing (right), and unambiguous AIs (… “opens like infinite” … “amazing, baffled” … “arouses curiosity” …).

At the end of the tunnel, I had the impression of a kind of door that was opened, and behind it was something like “colorful infinity” (I can’t put it any other way). Perhaps as if you were stepping out of a narrow airlock into immeasurable space, only that no boundaries or fixed reference points were perceptible here. The impressions were experienced by a group of individuals, of whom my first impression at stage 4 was:

“Group of EIs (emotional impacts) at the lower end – looking euphorically into the imposing – neutral hysteria”

I then examined the term “neutral hysteria” more precisely in stage 6 using a relational diagram, and recognized that the cause of this was “hope”, “open” and “what was impressive above” . At that moment I also noticed the opening of the aforementioned “door” and sketched it.

Then my monitor let me examine how the door was opened. The opening had something to do with the group of individuals (seminar participants?) And was partly caused by them. Now we asked what the other part was, which is also causing it, and the impressions came “Help from outside – powerful, great” . We examined the impression “help from outside” and asked about the intention, whereupon the impressions “benevolent – positive attention – help – enable” came about.

At that moment I also noticed that the help was coming from some highly developed, imposing entities, which more or less helped to open the “door” in both directions. These entities made a very pleasant and sublime impression. A company that you can enjoy through and through (as long as you don’t focus on it, like some ungrounded contemporaries in these areas 😉 ). Then we asked whether the group of individuals (G1) could do this alone, which was answered in the affirmative. On the part of the perceived entities, it was actually only a matter of assistance, and not an unconditional requirement.

Finally, we examined the IT “movement – then shoot in one direction” , which appeared in stage 4. We asked about the intention or the purpose, and I got the impressions “brighten – become clear – knowledge – reveal / Aha! -Effect” . Then the session ended with impressive conclusion AIs:

“Transformational”
“Spiritual”

And here again especially for you as an incredibly selfless luxury service; a transcribed (and translated) version of the relational diagrams from stage 6 (since right-brained writing is sometimes hardly legible :D):

CHEC-Unit

Summary:  A very interesting experience, the experience of other states of consciousness, so to speak from “outside”, without having to go out of the body, for example. And another example, which not only the physical world can be viewed, but also that which is normally ascribed to the metaphysical realm and which so far can only be experienced through self-experience. Furthermore, it is a good indication that such processes actually take place in the seminars at the Monroe Institute, and that it is not based on group suggestion or imagination (as poorly informed skeptics sometimes claim). Interesting side aspect: The “door” that appeared in the session was drawn by another viewer exactly like this in a session on a similar topic. Possibly an archetypal symbolism.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Smalltalk with Robert Monroe

Category: People / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 5541 5436 3046 9415
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-09-27
Time: 12:33 p.m. to 1:21 p.m.
Duration: 48 minutes
Pages: 9

Here again is a small example of the use of “communication” with the target using an interview tool. You can do these “interviews” with virtually any target, but whether you are actually communicating with the consciousness of an individual, or whether it is just a form of information query, has not yet been clarified. In any case, wakeful people usually don’t seem to notice. But there are also rare examples of interactive communication (which one is also “addressed” by the target), especially with non-physical entities. In that case I thought to contact the OoBE pioneer Robert Monroe (passed in 1995) and see what he is doing at the moment. The results were quite interesting … The target formulation was:

“Describe the Consciousness of Robert Monroe at the time of the session and make contact!

In stage 4, the emotional impact in the target was only from a single “person” who had the following sensations: “First look”, “feels connected”, “distance” (AOL/S: like doctor with patient) and “sympathy”.

5541543630469415 (Stufe 4)

Stage 4, including emotional impacts (EI)

In stage 6 we then took at the EIs, which we could already assign to a single person, using the “person perception” method. The person is referred to as “P1”. In addition to a funny sketch, the following information came about:

Activity? (what is the person doing?): stands on the edge, does something with his hands, but is careful not to have too much contact with the surface

According to our overall impression, P1 (Robert Monroe) was working on a kind of surface that lay wavy on the floor like molten glass. He seemed to “roll up” something that could be interpreted as information / consciousness work (we have had something like that in other sessions on metaphysical targets). He seemed to be very conscientious about this.

Vocation?: Is unnecessary, is in the middle, be careful, treat something

In the case of the “vocation” it is interesting that you always find out some main premises in (living) people, towards which one is or should be worked towards in the life of this person. In that case, however, it was as if P1 were the vocation itself, and not separate from it in terms of action.

5541543630469415 (Stufe 6 - Personenwahrnehmung)

Stage 6 with a (short) perception of people and a funny sketch

When my viewer was asked to describe the appearance, he perceived P1 with strangely distorted limbs and body shapes (including very long fingers and misshapen chest without skeletal structure). I interpreted this as an attempt by P1 to take on a defined form instead of just being undefined energy. In any case, one has to say that the portrayals of people (especially faces) only showed recognizable similarities in 30-50% of the cases. There is still a lot of research into this area.

Of course you could see a certain resemblance if you look at it humorously and caricaturally Lachen

5541543630469415 (Stufe 6 - Bob Monroe)

Distorted perception, provisionally formed astral body, or a preferred appearance?

Finally, the most important part of this session; the interview:

V = Viewer
P1 = Robert Monroe (presumably)

V: We greet you! Do you feel like it and have time for a conversation?
P1: Actually busy right now, apologizes for distraction (on the side is ok)
V: Where are you now? Can you give me an impression
P1: (Viewer sensation: “P1 throws pictures around!”) Smooth, uneven surface that you are not allowed to step on – the horizon is fully visible (AOL/S: Like desert)
V: What is your current job there?
P1: Something like foil rolls up
V: If you should have time later …
P1: Happy, change
V: … Can you try to give a sign in our dreams or in some other way that you consciously had this conversation with us?
P1: Yes, but conditions must be right on my part (P1).
V: Thank you for contacting us, and I’ll see you!
P1: Like acquaintance who shakes hands

Obviously P1 is busy at the moment with an important, for us incomprehensible task (energetic?), But is open to cooperation if the conditions (“have time”?) Are right for it. We have been paying attention to our dreams since the session and will provide updates if something goes wrong.

5541543630469415 (Stufe 6 - Interview)

A more in-depth, research-related purpose of this concern is to find out whether conscious communication actually took place, or whether we are only calling up information and P1 does not notice anything about it. A reaction would be an indication that P1 actually noticed something. One could try something like this with living people, for example, when they are in a state between wakefulness and sleep or while dreaming. Allegedly, some people would have already had telepathic messages, mind-reading experiences or contacts with the deceased, which is usually overlaid in the waking consciousness.

Finally, my viewer wrote down his overall emotional impression (AI – how do you like it?):

AI: Hi buddy! Known as work place Not 100% in the matter Amused / neglected

Summary: A content-wise unexpected, but sympathetic and relaxed session result on the current consciousness of the probably greatest OoBe pioneer of modern times. However, it also somehow suits him … Sehr glücklich

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Viewing a non-physical Construct

Category: Consciousness
Protocol:
CRV (Solo)
Coordinates:
384516789
Number of viewers:
1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions:
1
Date:
2011-10-17
Time:
11.25h PM to 12.43 AM
Duration:
78 minutes
Pages:
9

This was an experimental target, which was created by a friend of mine (here called Phrenorium). It is a non-physical construct that he visualizes, manifests, and expands over time in meditative states. His intention was to obtain a kind of verification of the “authenticity” of his construct by means of RV, ie, whether other people could perceive or visit it extra-sensually. Here is his own description, which he gave me after the session:

You have been in an astral world created by me that has been increasing in stability for years due to interaction on my part. The world has now become quite complex, and 1-2 years ago I then decided to materialize out of my head into a real sphere outside of this dimension so that “living things” can nest there. Anyway, I’ve send you to a mountainous area with a cave … I can also do a sketch for you. Anyway, from this cave you have a perfect and sublime impression of most of my astral world. I enjoy this view more often…

The TARGET ITSELF is the heart of my world or one of many. It is a special type of “etheric generator” that has been installed to keep the world stable and upright without my intervention. It consists of a spherical crystal, usually in the color light blue when activated by me, sometimes in purple (to tie my consciousness there, which allows me deeper impressions) this sphere is mounted on a long bright obelisk-like rod, which approximately 1.40 is big (then comes the sphere about it). The room itself is just a cave in these mountains.

He also drew the following sketches:

384516789 (Skizze der Höhle)Sketch of the “Cave” (Target)


And now for my session:

My session consisted of a standard procedure up to stage 4 (Stage 1 twice), a closer look at [x], [a] and [b.] Aspects, and a stage 6 relational diagram on one of the target properties. At the end I tried an analytical sketch of the overall impression and made a conclusion.


Impressions of Stage 2

Colors: red, yellow, neon green, dark, black, light blue
Textures: smooth, rounded, round, indented
Smells: stale, stuffy
Tastes: artificial, a bit metallic (partly)
Temperatures: cold
Sounds: buzzing, artificial
Dimensions: broad, low, hilly, subdivided, inside

AOL: Electricity


Impressions of Stage 3

384516789 (Stage 3)

AI: complex
AI: technically
AI: could be an astral form!

Although the impressions appeared rather physical at first, I had a feeling that I knew more likely from metaphysical targets (consciousness, emotions, etc …). They were already “solid” structures, but somehow different (more volatile?) than within physical targets.

My main interest now fell on three components of the scenario, which I examined again individually with [x], [a] and [b]. But before that, I made a stage 4 on the target in general:


Impressions of Stage 4

Sensory impressions (S): gloss, glassy, ​​light gray, light blue, rounded, smooth, dark
Dimensional impressions (D): narrow, far in, flat, low, subdivided
Aesthetic Impressions (AI): interesting, unusual, sophisticated
Emotional Impact (EI): looking down from above, enjoying the view
Tangibles: (T): different, subdivided, upright structures on surface, dark
Intangibles (IT): move, guide, systematics, functional areas

AOL: computer mainboard
AOL / S: Like a big hall
AI: functional
AI: complex
AI: combined


Stage 2 Impressions [x]

Textures: smooth, thin, tinny, hard
Colors: yellow, green, dark gray, shine
Smells: metallic, alkaline
Tastes: metallic, bitter
Temperatures: normal, warm
Sounds: hum, hiss
Dimensions: rounded, wrapped, partially hollow, covered

 
384516789 (X)

AOL: copper
AOL: battery
AOL: capacitor
IT: charged
AI: interesting
AI: seems like a specific function

Impressions of stage 6 [x] (per relational diagram) on the term “specific function”:

Specific function -> What does it do?
Picking up, guiding inwards, handing it over somewhere

Somewhere -> Where to?
Down, pedestal, pipe, or in the ground

What for?
Filling, pouring, substrate (?)

Note: The word “substrate” came to mind spontaneously, without me knowing what it meant at the moment. Something like that happens to me rarely when viewing. By definition, a substrate can be a foundation for something, such as to enable or sustain something. The object studied with [x], according to Phrenorium, serves as a kind of “etheric generator” that automatically keeps its non-physical construct stable, even when it is not working on it, or paying attention to it.


Impressions of Stage 2 [a]

Textures: rounded, thin, recessed
Colors: red, blue, silver, yellow-green
Smells: warm, neutral
Tastes: neutral
Temperatures: normal
Sounds:
Dimensions: rectangular, rounded, indented

AOL / S: like a ring
AOL: moon landing (came to me there spontaneously)
IT: holding something, readiness, just unused
AI. meets its purpose

384516789 (A)

This seems to be the circular area around the etheric generator (see sketch), but I perceived this element separately. I even had the impression that it was stuck in the air, but unfortunately rejected it without writing it down because it seemed too absurd.


Impressions of Stage 2 [b]

Textures: long, thin, aspiring, hollow
Colors: green, yellowish, striped
Smells: unidentified
Tastes: neutral, strawy (not really)
Temperatures: warm, dry
Sounds: rustling
Dimensions: high, long, branched

AOL: cablesalad
AOL: dry plant
T: plastic
IT: connect, support
AI: casual, secondary

384516789 (B)

This aspect may fit the forest that is present in the construct. However, this is outside the cave, so not in the immediate target area. But I did not seem to have been attracted to the aspects that I found interesting in the area because of the lack of exercise.


Overall sketch:

384516789 (Sketch)

An attempt to reassemble the individual aspects in position.


Conclusion: The target resembles complex, artificial structures on an equipped area. These structures have different functions. They do not do much for itself. They contribute something. Like a complex technology. Could be a circuit board. But they are unusually dark, and high / far. Maybe very big. Could also be thought forms / astral constructs!

Etheric Generator - Comparison

The session shows that it is indeed possible to view non-physical or metaphysical realities and specific functions inside it. However, they also seem to have some consistency or manifestation through repeated “charging” in order to get accurate data.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag