Archive for October 2012

The Garden Gnome

Category: Phaenomena
Number of viewers: 2
Number of sessions: 2

At this point I would like to show you that Remote Viewing can also be used very well to expose photographic fakes. This is of course especially interesting in the paranormal area, such as UFOs or ghost photos. While non-authentic ghost photos often can be explained with natural photo effects, deliberate fakes are found primarily in the UFO area.

In our case, however, we choosed a photo that would probably fall into the area “entities” or “mythical creatures”. The starting point was a message board discussion about “orbs” and similar photo-phenomena. One of the users there eventually posted a black and white photo, that supposedly showed a dwarf creature in a nighttime forest. I quickly created a target on it:


Viewer #1

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 13.01.2011 2011/01/13
Time: 8.43pm to 8.51pm
Duration: 8 minutes
Pages: 3

The first, really short session was conducted by a RV beginner up to Stage 3. It should have been her second or third session in total. Interestingly enough, an EI already appeared in Stage 1, namely “regret” . Whether this related to the photographer of the picture? The Stage 1 AI was then “curious” .

In Stage 2 , data matching the surroundings of the picture emerged, with “borky” and “woody” being the most noticeable ones. The AI ​​at the end of this stage now turned into “boring” . According to the sensory impressions, the viewer seemed to be on target.

Stage 3 has now become even clearer as it clearly suggests a forest environment (although for beginners this could of course be an AOL sketch due to the woody impressions, and what they also wrote out as AOLs). There was also something shiny and metallic, which could point to the wire fence in the picture. But there was no trace for a extraordinary aspect in the target, like a metaphysical dwarf. Such extraordinary content usually attracts the unconscious attention of the viewer, as it does with UFO photos or sessions on exoplanets. The AI ​​at the end: “inconsequential”


Viewer # 2

Protocol: TRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2011/01/13
Time: 10.45pm to 11.07pm
Duration: 22 minutes
Pages: 5

The second session was done by a far more experienced viewer. The basic data of the first stages were also in line with the picture here. To shorten the session, the most important aspect of the target was examined directly from Stage 3 (here marked with a [x] in the middle, secondary aspects with [a], [b] and [c]):

Separate detail drawing of the [x] aspect

Stage 4 brought similar AIs, as from the first session: “boring – strange – stupid” . EIs were in the [x] aspect no one to determine, from which one could probably conclude that it is not a living object. Also interesting are the ITs “stand – nature” .

Finally, in Stage 6 , the structure of the [x] aspect was inspected closer. It came back to the IT “stand” and also unspectacular Ts (tangible things / materials) as “clay” and “wood”. Around the structure, there were also the Ts “meadow” and “area” . As a final AI, the viewer found the target as “boring”.

The detailed sketch of the structure clearly shows that it was an exakt hit. The attached data leads to the conclusion that it is not a living entity or an metaphysical entity, but a static object made of ordinary materials. Note also the AOLs “robot”, and especially “garden gnome”.

Summary: After we published the two sessions, the somewhat impressed photographer gave us a photo with a (fairly broken) garden gnome there in the meadows, that has been deliberately photographed in black and white. Would he have admitted it if the sessions had not brought such clear results? In any case, a great example of how Remote Viewing can expose photographic fakes …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Baltic Sea Anomaly (Ocean-X)

Category: Archeology
Number of viewers: 4
Number of sessions: 4

I’ve sent four viewers to the mysterious circular structure in the Baltic Sea. All sessions were conducted up to Stage 6. A few background information on the subject can be found here (in german language):

grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Schatzsucher finden mysteriöse Kreisstruktur am Grunde der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Mysteriöse Kreisstruktur am Grund der Ostsee wird aus der Nähe erforscht
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Neue Informationen über das mysteriöse Objekt in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Weitere Informationen und Ankündigung neuer “unglaublicher Aufnahmen” des mysteriösen Objekts in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Neue Bilder vom mysteriösen Objekt in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Mysteriöses Objekt am Ostseegrund: Neuigkeiten aus der Tiefe
The Ocean Explorer (Website des Ocean X-Teams)



Viewer #1

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/14
Time: 2: 21pm to 3:14pm
Duration: 53 minutes
Pages: 8

This session took place just before the first dive photos of the Baltic Sea Anomaly were published. Perceptible was the circular structure, which could be more or less differentiated from the surrounding seabed. It also showed something like a hollow funnel and crags that were either on the object, or inside the object (or both). In the properties of these tips, or the whole object itself came out something like “chemical processes”, and “temperature fluctuations” (eg clear cold inside the structure). Also, a sense of “radiation” has been felt, but it is not clear whether it is thermal or radioactive radiation (or something else).

First, sketched impressions of the viewer in Stage 3. The compulsory data of Stage 1 and 2 (colors, surfaces, etc …) already fit well with the published photos . The viewer has subsequently labeled the sketches for readability:

Later, we examined the structure in detail after moving the viewer slightly outside of it to see if he perceived the seabed around it. A funnel-like structure in the interior came into view:

Here is the impression again in cross-section, with the perception of the above-mentioned “lace” inside. The viewer also perceived a kind of circulation, which is also drawn:

Now one of the “tips” in detail. It showed a kind of flow or circulation inside. Whether it is water, radiation or another form of energy, it is unclear:

In the end, we also investigated several options for the target via the action line. Essentially it came out that the structure was used by a group for the extraction of something:

Summary: In a single session on such targets, of course, not much can be said. But apparently the viewer was on target, and generated some essential data that would later become interesting for comparison purposes.

Viewer # 2

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/24
Time: 7.34pm to 8.11pm
Duration: 37 minutes
Pages: 6

This time a circle structure was percieved again, but it looked much more artificial than in the previous session. But the viewer always had the impressions “artificial and natural”. Interesting or were box-shaped, arranged around the circle structures that looked hollow. Again, a funnel-like structure appeared, which seemed to lead us nowhere (we did not find anything down there, also no ground). In addition, there is a slight pull there, but not so strong that he could suck a human (that’s what the viewer felt). And in the funnel itself it is considerably colder than it is outside.

After the viewer first appeared somewhere in the murky water, and did not notice anything from the actual target, I did a movement command. He was already able to perceive the first impressions of the circular structure:

In Stage 6 , we took a close look at all the impressions collected since the movement exercise. This is how the funnel-shaped structure appeared, around which box-like objects appeared to be arranged. These acted hollow and tinny on the viewer, serving as a kind of container. In the funnel-shaped structure below it seemed to go in deep and cold. Here, the viewer also took the said suction, but which would not be strong enough to pull a man.

Summary: Here, after initial navigation difficulties, very interesting detail impressions were delivered from the target. Especially the aspect of the “funnel” came across quite clearly here. Compared to the first session, a picture of a circulating process or exchange (of whatever kind) is beginning to appear rather intentional than natural (at least in its original purpose). But that should be specified.

Viewer # 3

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/27
Time: 10.11am to 11.03am
Duration: 52 minutes
Pages: 7

The viewer had an immediately strong target contact, and hardly needed to be moved around in the target area to generate the information sought. Like the two previous viewers, the viewer here also perceived a circular structure on the ground, and also noticed very clearly that it is in the water. Already in Stage 1 she drew this first, rough impression of the target:

In Stage 3, the viewer then very clearly got the impression of a round structure on the bottom of a liquid, cloudy medium. Some surface details were already revealed. Only the size estimate (70cm) was still deceptive, but later she noticed that it looks much bigger (see below). Interestingly, she also found the target “lost”:

Finally, in Stage 6 , we focused completely on the structure and made it as detailed as possible:

The viewer almost saw the object as a house or dwelling, except that it was metallic in appearance. It showed something like well-kept rivets and angular structures on the outside, as well as a kind of opening or hatch on top (top picture). There was also something on the side, which could have been a door or an entrance. Then I let her look inside the structure (bottom picture), which she found very unusual. They look like a strangely upholstered and cozy environment made up of exotic, cleverly designed and constructed structures. The structure seemed to have a deeper meaning.

When we investigated the purpose of this structure and the object itself, it first came out that it originally had a different function, but now serves as a “shelter” for any living thing. We looked at the creatures for a moment, and they looked worm-like or snakelike, which might indicate marine animals (eels, worms …) now living in, around, or below (the actual interior did not seem to be filled with water). But of course we also wanted to know the original purpose of the object.

When we did this, the following came out (quote):

What was the original function?

– Emit something, serve to tap or draw energy
– One puts oneself in, and lets it work on itself
– Inside, it’s like something magnetic; It’s supposed to strike you when you get in the act
– Energy flow, as if all your polarities align themselves

In the context of today’s “purpose”, it still came out that it was the “last source” of this species, and the creatures living in it (animals?) are there because of it, want to have to do. In any case, this impression indicates that you would feel energetically well-tempered inside the structure.

Then I let the viewer do a spontaneous scaling to find the approximate size of the object. The Ocean X team goes from 60m (~197ft), if I remember correctly. Here is the result of the viewer (~ 65m or ~213ft):

Then I had a timeline done to find out the approximate age or timing of the genesis (which, mind you, is not always reliable, it’s not always as literal as a yardstick, because “pinching” can also occur). The impression was “a few hundred years” , which fits one of the previous sessions. We roughly measured it to 1300 AD. But only under reserve, because at the moment we had problems with our Skype connection (which can bring out a viewer strongly).

Below, I let the viewer again make a summary sketch in plan view and side view. As a final AI (emotional conclusion) she had “makes me curious – something secret inside” . Then we finished the session.

Summary: One could now speculate from this detailed session that it is a kind of forgotten / lost technology, which was used for energetic purposes (see pyramid energy and the like). But from Baltic volcanism to ancient secret knowledge it would be a big jump. It also shows why it is so important to make several sessions on such “mystery” targets, as each viewer looks at individual aspects of the target (depending on the interest of the subconscious), and only a lot of impressions make an evaluation possible.


Viewer # 4

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/28
Time: 9.17pm to 9.46pm
Duration: 29 minutes
Pages: 6

This viewer got the same target but with new coordinates (because the monitor did not have the old target at the time):

Here as well, the first stages showed similar data as in the previous three sessions. In Stage 3 , the target was again drawn very clearly, this time with seabed:

In Stage 4 , the AOLs “Mars” and “Baltic Anomaly” appeared, which hopefully did not affect the other data. The viewer found something exciting, which was then examined in detail in Stage 6 . This turned out to be the round structure on the seabed. It was perceived as “smooth” and “artificial”. As AOL came at the point “Land Mine”:

A movement command was performed that centered the viewer on the actual target. The structure was clearly perceived as artificial here:

The ITs showed the aspects “observation” and “measure”. The viewer also had the impression “not for people”. Furthermore, he had as AI “Maybe someday someone will come, and wait for that”. In addition, the viewer mentioned that he felt like under water.

Here you were on Target, because the circular structure was clearly hit again.
The mandatory dates and sketches are very much in line with the other sessions. The impressions from Stage 6 are to be interpreted with some reservations, since the AOL “Baltic Sea anomaly” already occurred in Stage 4. To what extent the viewer could solve it, I do not know. But in any case, it is another verification that there actually exists a circular structure on the bottom of the baltic sea, which is unusual.

Preliminary overall summary:

The Baltic Sea Anomaly proved to be quite persistent target. From the sheer quantity of data, it could go in the direction of an ancient building that had a certain energetic (perhaps technological) function. As interpretations there is, for example, a kind of power place or device for energy healing, or a temple that had more ideal or informal value. Strangely enough, our timelines to date point to a time between the early and early Middle Ages, which makes the position of the object puzzling. Because at that time there should already have been water there (in contrast to the ice age, for example). If there are more usable session results, the project will be updated …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Remote Viewing Angels

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor)
Coordinates: 97 08 16 1000 01
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012/02/05
Time: 3.11pm to 4.30pm
Duration: 79 minutes
Pages: 11

I’ve been conducting this target during my RV training (as the only “Mystery” target besides normal training targets). It is part of a research project that has been running for some time and has produced similar results so far. The target formulation was:

“The angels – their most important tasks and the opportunity to get help from them.”

Stages 1 and 2 were quite unspectacular. Stage 3 showed a shadowy scenario in which a frightening life-form cowered somewhere and a much larger life-form approached (AOLs such as “Animal Enclosure” or “Animal Photographer” came up).

In Stage 4, we came closer to the cause by the emotional impacts (from two different creatures).

Impressions in Stage 4

Sensory impressions (S): Small hollowed out, red, blue, yellow, bushy, pointed
Dimensional impressions (D): tall, narrow, rounded, higher than wide, towering,
Aesthetic Impression (AI): Free, wide, calm, clear
Emotional Impact (EI): Fearful, Excited, Shocked, Unprepared [1] – Watching, a little excited, relaxed [2]
Tangibles (T): What high, round, thin
Intangibles (IT): Fencing and capturing, emulating

AI (emotional conclusion of the viewer): “Trivial, what is that?”

In Stage 6, we then tried to break down the situation in more detail. We called the small, cowering life form L1, and the great life form L2. L1 reacted to L2. The L2-being acted on me like a kind of upright, very large statue, which was supposed to radiate “impressiveness” (light, gray, white, standing there, handling something, hands rounded to the body, seems to attract something). The task of L2 seemed to be to capture and pull L1. As further data on L2 came “thinks weird / narrowed, irascible, looking down, picking up, higher presence”.

Now I should do a movement exercise to “follow” L2. It felt like this statuesque L2 was just a kind of placeholder or avatar for something else. But the way to the origin of L2 seemed strange, because in the midst of it a kind of “phase shift”, which I perceived only as an “infinity aspect”. It did not only act like a spatial distance, but also like a change of planes.

There was a first, felt stop that led me further to a life form I called L3. L3 looked like a gray-yellow curved or round structure. But that, too, just felt like a placeholder or a representation.

We decided to move on until we came across the “real” L3 (or the source of previous representations).

After we skipped a last placeholder, which strangely acted like two upright tubes, I came in touch with the original L3. It looked very distant like a human figure, but on closer inspection it looked more like a hollow sphere with a thin membrane and yellowish, spaghetti-like energy structures inside. In addition, there seemed to be an opening through which energy flows. I gave the statement “incomprehensible for my frame”.

Now I should have an interview with L3:

V = viewer (me)
L3 = L3 ()

(Own additions or explanations to non-verbal processes in italics)

V: Hello!
L3: Attention
V: Sorry, we would like to know something.
L3: Reserved, does not really want to
V: We would like to help you. What do you do?
L3: Attention, becomes open
V: Request for information (what L3 is doing)
L3: Push some kind of gray wrapping to me and want to bring me in / welcome
V: Can not go now, but we’d like to know what happens when you do that.
L3: It opens something in L3, to pick up or integrate
V: Sense of the action?
L3: Add and store in (head area)
V: Will that ever happen?
L3: No (L3 seems disappointed)
V: Prerequisite for this?
L3: Should be more appropriate
V: What does “matching” mean?
L3: Rolling together, shaping (i’m getting the picture of a rolled-up substance)

V: Procedure to make us (humans) compatible?
L3: understanding. Open up to it.
V: Physiological consequences?
L3: becoming thinner and bony (perceive the image of what is thin, gray, bony – apparently “bones” are meant)

V: Would it be desirable for me?
L3: Yes
V: Is there a timeline for this?
L3: Growth, collect (living beings), group (Age: Aeon / ~ 1000 years)
V: What is the end purpose of your activity?
L3: Keep expanding until I dissolve.
V: What happens after dissolution?
L3: Being distributed, transformation, individual parts spread out in a targeted manner, and are inserted / inserted in different places – parts are then in place and thus widen their observation radius. (AOL: Sun)

V: Do you have colleagues?
L3: Yes
V: How many?
L3: Dozens
V: Are there any who do something else?
L3: Also other directions.
V: Thanks a lot, see you soon!
L3: Merry bye.

AI: I’m back here
AI: Interesting

An interesting session on an unusual target.
I interpret the situation as follows: We witnessed how a nonphysical entity (“Angel”) wanted to capture and apprehend a frightened, stuck “soul”. It seems to be the normal occupation of this entity. The interview also featured interesting, non-verbal impressions, such as “curling in to make more appropriate”, which seems to fit some of Robert Monroe’s descriptions of his communication with nonphysical entities (information / energy in the right shape). “to make them compatible”). In addition, the bizarre impression of “bones” when we asked about the physiological consequences so that it could be “suitable”. It only became clear to me after the session that actually bones could have been meant.

Apparently, there are not too many of these forms of consciousness, and they each perform specific tasks that are fixed. Personally, I found them to be sociable and enjoyable, albeit somewhat biased (which presumably dictates the task). You could put them in the “lightful” category, while the more colorful and polarizing aspects of how humans make them seem to be missing. But they obviously carry out their “craft” competently. Before this mutates into a product review, I conclude with the conclusion: Pleasant, if somewhat pale / one-sided contemporaries with important tasks in the universe. I like to say hello again if they cross my path …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Mysterious Sounds in the Sky

Category: Phaenomena
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 7452 9456 7885 6316
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012/01/24
Time: N/A
Duration: N/A
Pages: 7

The target was this video from Belgium with the mysterious sky noise:

The target formulation was:

“Describe the booming sound heard in the video, its cause and purpose!” (With video URL)

The target was processed by Benny to stage 6. As a first impression, I would say the following about our results:

It was most likely not a fake, in the sense of a subsequently built-in noise. There was no such intention, and the incoming data was so powerful and amazing for the viewer that it would not fit a fake. Feeling deeper into the AIs also revealed no negative aspects (in the sense of HAARP, Bluebeam or the like). It seemed rather to be a very sublime and pure consciousness (apparently non-human, or at least not categorizable) that produced these effects for a particular purpose.

The purpose included aspects such as “cleanse” (which should be replaced by warm / cold wet cold water), “occupy” (which “belongs to”, but no structural / physical premises) and “leave an impression”. The latter included the aspects of “imprint”, “education” and “pointing in the right direction”). In describing the entity doing this (“by whom?”), Aspects such as “feminine,” “wise,” “delicate,” and “nonhuman, because so perfect,” came. If I had to guess , I would come up with “Gaia” or “Earth Consciousness”. But that only purely hypothetical, otherwise I will not do justice to the “neutrality” that I expect from myself. Fool

Here are some interesting details from the session …

In Stage 3 , an interior spatiality with windows and an outdoor area can be interpreted (like the environment in the video):

The source of the noise has been clearly identified and marked with an [x] (this is done for a later detailed investigation of this aspect). The aspect “wet cold” is also interesting because it was rainy in the video outside. A closer examination of the cause of the noise made it rather abstract. Benny drew the following sketch:

There was a “vibration” in the noise source, which apparently took place in a spatial but non-material environment (at least there were no surfaces to touch, but that could be in the air). On closer inspection, a shiny, golden ball appeared. It seemed to be the center of the whole thing:

In the following Stage 4, detailed aspects of the target were queried in tabular form:

Finally, Stage 6 with the Relational tool, which in this case was used on Stage 4 terms that we wanted to explore more closely:

The underlined terms from Stage 4 were examined. In the last box (middle right), I asked Benny to spontaneously draw the person / entity that made it all up. But it was, as I said, not really tangible / categorizable, but only a kind of indefinable, impressive consciousness. See also final AIs in Stage 4 at the end:

“I’m lost for words”
“Everything I write is absolutely meant”
“Love (caring sense), security”
“Wet cold (unintentionally carry along)”

Summary: It was a very impressive session (for the viewer). Of course, since it was just a single session, we can not be fully sure about the true nature of the target. Of course, there is still the possibility of getting into some AULs, and the target is actually a well-made fake. But the AIs are remarkable here.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Viewing a non-physical Construct

Category: Consciousness
CRV (Solo)
Number of viewers:
1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions:
11.25h PM to 12.43 AM
78 minutes

This was an experimental target, which was created by a friend of mine (here called Phrenorium). It is a non-physical construct that he visualizes, manifests, and expands over time in meditative states. His intention was to obtain a kind of verification of the “authenticity” of his construct by means of RV, ie, whether other people could perceive or visit it extra-sensually. Here is his own description, which he gave me after the session:

You have been in an astral world created by me that has been increasing in stability for years due to interaction on my part. The world has now become quite complex, and 1-2 years ago I then decided to materialize out of my head into a real sphere outside of this dimension so that “living things” can nest there. Anyway, I’ve send you to a mountainous area with a cave … I can also do a sketch for you. Anyway, from this cave you have a perfect and sublime impression of most of my astral world. I enjoy this view more often…

The TARGET ITSELF is the heart of my world or one of many. It is a special type of “etheric generator” that has been installed to keep the world stable and upright without my intervention. It consists of a spherical crystal, usually in the color light blue when activated by me, sometimes in purple (to tie my consciousness there, which allows me deeper impressions) this sphere is mounted on a long bright obelisk-like rod, which approximately 1.40 is big (then comes the sphere about it). The room itself is just a cave in these mountains.

He also drew the following sketches:

Sketch of the cave (Target)
Sketch of the overall world

And now for my session:

My session consisted of a standard procedure up to stage 4 (Stage 1 twice), a closer look at [x], [a] and [b.] Aspects, and a stage 6 relational diagram on one of the target properties. At the end I tried an analytical sketch of the overall impression and made a conclusion.

Impressions of Stage 2

Colors: red, yellow, neon green, dark, black, light blue
Textures: smooth, rounded, round, indented
Smells: stale, stuffy
Tastes: artificial, a bit metallic (partly)
Temperatures: cold
Sounds: buzzing, artificial
Dimensions: broad, low, hilly, subdivided, inside

AOL: Electricity

Impressions of Stage 3

AI: complex
AI: technically
AI: could be an astral form!

Although the impressions appeared rather physical at first, I had a feeling that I knew more likely from metaphysical targets (consciousness, emotions, etc …). They were already “solid” structures, but somehow different (more volatile?) than within physical targets.

My main interest now fell on three components of the scenario, which I examined again individually with [x], [a] and [b]. But before that, I made a stage 4 on the target in general:

Impressions of stage 4

Sensory impressions (S): gloss, glassy, ​​light gray, light blue, rounded, smooth, dark
Dimensional impressions (D): narrow, far in, flat, low, subdivided
Aesthetic Impressions (AI): interesting, unusual, sophisticated
Emotional Impact (EI): looking down from above, enjoying the view
Tangibles: (T): different, subdivided, upright structures on surface, dark
Intangibles (IT): move, guide, systematics, functional areas

AOL: computer mainboard
AOL / S: Like a big hall
AI: functional
AI: complex
AI: combined

Stage 2 Impressions [x]

Textures: smooth, thin, tinny, hard
Colors: yellow, green, dark gray, shine
Smells: metallic, alkaline
Tastes: metallic, bitter
Temperatures: normal, warm
Sounds: hum, hiss
Dimensions: rounded, wrapped, partially hollow, covered


AOL: copper
AOL: battery
AOL: capacitor
IT: charged
AI: interesting
AI: seems like a specific function

Impressions of stage 6 [x] (per relational diagram) on the term “specific function”:

Specific function -> What does it do?
Picking up, guiding inwards, handing it over somewhere

Somewhere -> Where to?
Down, pedestal, pipe, or in the ground

What for?
Filling, pouring, substrate (?)

Note: The word “substrate” came to mind spontaneously, without me knowing what it meant at the moment. Something like that happens to me rarely when viewing. By definition, a substrate can be a foundation for something, such as to enable or sustain something. The object studied with [x], according to Phrenorium, serves as a kind of “etheric generator” that automatically keeps its non-physical construct stable, even when it is not working on it, or paying attention to it.

Impressions of Stage 2 [a]

Textures: rounded, thin, recessed
Colors: red, blue, silver, yellow-green
Smells: warm, neutral
Tastes: neutral
Temperatures: normal
Dimensions: rectangular, rounded, indented

AOL / S: like a ring
AOL: moon landing (came to me there spontaneously)
IT: holding something, readiness, just unused
AI. meets its purpose

This seems to be the circular area around the etheric generator (see sketch), but I perceived this element separately. I even had the impression that it was stuck in the air, but unfortunately rejected it without writing it down because it seemed too absurd.

Impressions of Stage 2 [b]

Textures: long, thin, aspiring, hollow
Colors: green, yellowish, striped
Smells: unidentified
Tastes: neutral, strawy (not really)
Temperatures: warm, dry
Sounds: rustling
Dimensions: high, long, branched

AOL: cablesalad
AOL: dry plant
T: plastic
IT: connect, support
AI: casual, secondary

This aspect may fit the forest that is present in the construct. However, this is outside the cave, so not in the immediate target area. But I did not seem to have been attracted to the aspects that I found interesting in the area because of the lack of exercise.

Overall sketch:

An attempt to reassemble the individual aspects in position.

Conclusion: The target resembles complex, artificial structures on an equipped area. These structures have different functions. They do not do much for itself. They contribute something. Like a complex technology. Could be a circuit board. But they are unusually dark, and high / far. Maybe very big. Could also be thought forms / astral constructs!

Etheric Generator - Comparison

The session shows that it is indeed possible to view non-physical or metaphysical realities and specific functions inside it. However, they also seem to have some consistency or manifestation through repeated “charging” in order to get accurate data.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Venera spacecraft on the planet Venus

Category: Astronomy
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 1524-3997
Number of viewers: 1 (Christian Rotz)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 02/02/2011
Time: 12.11pm to 12.32pm
Duration: 21 minutes
Pages: 5

This target was based on a color image of the landing probe of one of the russian Venera spacecrafts. They survived only briefly in the inhospitable Venus atmosphere (official data: almost 500°C heat, almost 100 bar air pressure and sulfuric acid clouds). It was a short session from our early days in Remote Viewing.

Venera Probe - Target

The target was processed until Stage 4. It included a separate processing on a single aspect ([x]), and two movement exercises (one for centering, and one from 50m above the target). Here are the most interesting excerpts and aspects of the session:

Stage 2 Impressions

Colors: white, light, black, gloss, yellow
Textures: Soft, hard, yielding, dry
Smells: Artificial, rubbery, plastic
Tastes: Artificial
Temperatures: cool, fresh
Sounds: hum
Dimensions: flat, leveled, tall, far, floating

Stage 2 Impressions [x]

Surfaces: cool, hard, wet
Colors: gray, white, dark
Smells: Artificial, rubbery
Tastes: soft
Temperatures: cool
Sounds: noise, crackling
Dimensions: flat, wide, angular, shallow, upright

Venera Probe - Sketch 1
Sketch after movement exercise 50m above the target

Stage 4 Impressions [x]

Sensory impressions (S): soft, dry, yielding, grainy, mushy
Dimensional impressions (D): outside, wide, heavy
Aesthetic Impression (AI): disorder, useful, endure
Emotional Impact (EI): difficult, coping, concern, intolerance
Intangibles (IT): protection, damage

AI (emotional conclusion of the viewer): “I don’t want to be there!”

Venera Probe - Sketch 2Spontaneous sketch after Stage 4 with impressions of the environment. Low hills or dunes are to be guessed.

Venera Probe - Sketch 3

More detailed sketch, were we can guess the Venera landing probe on the right side. In addition, there is a movement aspect which may refer to the landing approach.

I would like to emphasize above all the emotional impressions (EI) in Stage 4, which can be understood as foreign emotions on the target. Interestingly enough, these are in keeping with the general mood that prevailed in mission control at that time around this part of the mission (since the probes, as we said at the beginning, quickly became inoperative and one could be glad to get any data from them at all). At least that is more plausible at first sight than that there were any living beings on the Venus surface who felt these complex emotions. In that case, one could even speculate that the probe acted as a kind of “avatar” for the emotions and impressions of the ground crew on Earth who controlled it. Other Venus sessions that have since been made, but were targeted away from the landing probe, did not show any EIs in the local environment (which is really rare when you’re used to targets on Earth).

Venera (CGI)

Another peculiar aspect is the descriptions of “cool” in the temperatures. According to official measurements, the Venus surface is around 480-500 °C. Only the interior of the probe was initially cooled to below 0° C, so it worked for a short time at all. However, the absence of heat is already noticeable. It must be said, however, that a viewer in such sensory individual aspects can also be wrong (apparently often in colors and temperatures).

Several sessions with different viewers on the same target would perhaps provide even more differentiated results of the individual impressions. But apart from the temperature aspect (unless it’s really cooler there and the temperature measurements are flawed), the session is amazingly accurate.

Update 10/10/2012: In the meantime, such unexpected temperature sensations have also been revealed during sessions on other planets or other extreme environments, which are sometimes described as inappropriate, but sometimes also suitable (eg “freezing cold” in space, “as in a furnace” on the sun, “like in a steel mill” in other Venus sessions). It is still unclear what these different sensations are, but perhaps it has to do with the extraordinary temperature conditions in such targets, which are simply beyond the usual temperature sensations of humans (like with hot steam or dry ice one sometimes cann not tell if it is hot or cold).

Summary: An interesting single session on the planet Venus, which confirmed well known facts, but also offered unexpected aspects.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Various session extracts

Here is a small collection of various session excerpts, mainly from exercise targets (or calibration targets). Although such well-made sketches may be impressive, the RV mainly looks at the underlying data (ie, what you can not see in a photo). However, especially in level 3, the sketches serve as feedback to the monitor as to whether the viewer is “on target” (or for solo sessions, just for the viewer itself).

Rough stage 6 extract from a sail mast (pay attention to the climber).


A kind of diving bell.


Egyptian-style corridor in a museum with replicas of famous exhibits. The rilled structure on the statue came into its own in the session. The AI ​​states, among other things, “like artwork / exhibition”.


Rotating disco ball with analysis of the surface. A very confusing target …


Ignition wheel of a Zippo lighter, including correct direction of rotation. The corresponding “stick” is inside under the wheel (it presses the flint against the wheel with a spring).


Antique dog (the two humans strangely did not appear in the session).


RV - Saturn

Session on the planet Saturn, where especially a conspicuous, hexagonal storm at one of the poles was well described.


Impressions from a session on a dive. Here you can guess on the basis of the spontaneous dimension (~ 2m] and the facial features with “mask” of a diver.


Also from the session on a dive; a lifeform-impression, which indicates according to dimension and appearance on a fish (which led also inevitably to the AUL “Fish”).


AOL hits on a fountain (first sketch) with later approach to the real structure (second sketch).


Example of a selfportrait of the viewer. He made a blind-session on himself and was finally told to draw the target wave . The arrows came from the direction of his screen (Skype session), and were perceived as lights.


RV - Der Test

Example from the short RV-documentary “Remote Viewing – The Test.


Stage 4 on an industrial robot. The intangibles (like “production”) are especially interesting here.


RV - Belgien-Dreieck

Stage 3 on the famous triangle UFO of Belgium in 1989.


RV - Grippevirus

Session on a gastrointestinal flu virus that caused “fulminant vomiting diarrhea”.


Deep Mind Probe - Portrait

Portrait of a person perception in stage 6.


Trails am Himmel

“…Nothing but blue skies do I see…”


Identification chip inside a runaway pet as a target for localization.


Localization of a lost wallet with money.


Good example of the puzzle-like perception of individual aspects in stage 3.


Saturn V-Rakete

Stage 3 session on a Saturn V rocket.


RV - Pyramide

Great Pyramid of Giza


Atomium - Skizze

Atomium in Brussels


Mars - Opportunity

Opportunity rover on Mars


Golden Gate Bridge

Golden Gate Bridge


Firefighting Plane



Adivino-Pyramid in Uxmal (final sketch after four solo-sessions by Benny Pamp)



Fireworks (Trainee-Session)


Kölner Dom

Cologne Cathedral (Trainee-Session)