Archive for October 2012

Strange Arms at OoBE

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 3657 3454 1767 1486
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-10-13
Time: 8.45 p.m. to 9.48 p.m.
Duration: 63 minutes
Pages: 9

What can you find out when you look at people’s experiences of consciousness? The “Monroe Institute: CHEC Units” session already gave a first glimpse . Now, however, the opportunity arose for an even more special target, which comes directly from an experience report of the Thetawaves forum:

Thetawaves-Forum: Fremde Arme (german)

The other day, after re-entering the body, I had a situation that seriously gave me pause. At that point in time, I was already completely locked into the physical body with my non-physical body – almost physically awake. Indeed, I suddenly felt for a few seconds how other non-physical arms pushed their way from behind through my physical arms … so into my physical body, so to speak, from behind through the shoulders and into the fingers …. kind of like pushing your arms into latex gloves in an isolation chamber. The arms felt very cold and strange (lifeless) … that was damn scary and I wonder what the intention is and from whom … Especially this unspeakable coldness of the arms shocked me. That might sound a bit paranoid, but it was really very intense and real …

The target cue:


*Translation: “Describe Wendulins Experience that he reported in the Thetawaves-Forum in the following post…”

As is usual with such targets, the first stages showed a tangle of (often indefinable) colors and surfaces. The AIs of stage 1 expressed themselves as follows: “Prison feeling – contrast (free / walled in) – dead end – like course”

In stage 2 these AIs were shown: “Artificial – simulated – sadly authentic and not authentic” . The viewer felt that part of the target was “real” and another part was “fake”. What that could mean later became clearer.

In stage 3 , the viewer drew a strange scene with a person in the center. Here he felt it was half “real + sad” and half “fake + happy”:


So far it was only pretty abstract data (which is typical with such targets).

Of course, it gets more interesting in stage 4. The aesthetical impacts (AIs) of the viewer to the target were “One side is real (the hollow one), the other side is like a kind of hologram / illusion” . With the emotional impacts (EIs) he then perceived two separate persons / entities. Person 1 (P1) felt something like “shock cold, steadfastness, assertion” and appeared “unimpressed” . Person 2 (P2), on the other hand, appeared “hardened, used, waiting” and “bored” . As ITs of the target there was “bring it down, look at it, project” and“Create ideal / demonstrate”. The viewer’s overall conclusion about the situation was:

“Dilemma”
“Like shortly before the solution”
“Something very small is missing”

In stage 6 we then looked at the aspect “Something is missing” more precisely. We asked what was missing and it was “Idea, sparkling thought, blocked” . Here it became even clearer that only a tiny little thing is missing to something. We then continued with a person perception in order to take a closer look at the two individuals (P1 and P2) occurring in the target.

Investigation and sketching of P1 and its activities (remarkable; the estimated age at 253 years – does that relate to the energy body or soul part?). P1 is on a kind of projection surface that she apparently “operates”.

Here now also P2, after which the “relationship” between P1 and P2 was also examined.

Essentially it came out that P1 tries to break through a kind of wall or blockade, but for which the said “little thing” is still missing. P2, on the other hand, waits on the “other side” and acts like an exam taker or “representative of the supervisory authority”. Obviously, this seems to be a familiar thing for P2, because they just “sit” there, bored and waiting. More precisely, P2 was waiting for a “result from P1”. A guide who should help, but who can only contribute once the OoBe practitioner has achieved the necessary “little thing”?

But how do you explain the aspect of the “strange arms” from the experience report? In fact, no direct contact or touch between P1 and P2 was visible during the session. On the contrary: It all pointed to a spatial / dimensional separation. The viewer developed its own theory afterwards (click for full screen):

So maybe it wasn’t a guide at all, and the experiencer practically “groped himself”? Again one of countless and still emerging puzzles from metaphysical realms …

Summary: An abstract, but interesting session on an experience on the border between wakefulness and sleep. The interpretation of the processes arises from comparison experiences that were made in this state. The symbolism with some kind of projection surface appears more often with such targets. Sessions on dreams also go in the same direction, although further sessions are required in order to be able to accept recurring patterns.

This also opens up the possibility of interesting RV projects in connection with OoBE-experiments: How are the experiences made with the respective techniques or approaches? Are there such things as recognizable constants, or does the data composition remain purely subjective? Can one contribute RV as a verification aid or additional data acquisition? Perhaps a combined OoBE / RV experiment can be carried out in the Thetawaves community in the future …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

The Garden Gnome

Category: Phaenomena
Number of viewers: 2
Number of sessions: 2

At this point I would like to show you that Remote Viewing can also be used very well to expose photographic fakes. This is of course especially interesting in the paranormal area, such as UFOs or ghost photos. While non-authentic ghost photos often can be explained with natural photo effects, deliberate fakes are found primarily in the UFO area.

In our case, however, we choosed a photo that would probably fall into the area “entities” or “mythical creatures”. The starting point was a message board discussion about “orbs” and similar photo-phenomena. One of the users there eventually posted a black and white photo, that supposedly showed a dwarf creature in a nighttime forest. I quickly created a target on it:

 

Viewer #1

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 13.01.2011 2011/01/13
Time: 8.43pm to 8.51pm
Duration: 8 minutes
Pages: 3

The first, really short session was conducted by a RV beginner up to Stage 3. It should have been her second or third session in total. Interestingly enough, an EI already appeared in Stage 1, namely “regret” . Whether this related to the photographer of the picture? The Stage 1 AI was then “curious” .

In Stage 2 , data matching the surroundings of the picture emerged, with “borky” and “woody” being the most noticeable ones. The AI ​​at the end of this stage now turned into “boring” . According to the sensory impressions, the viewer seemed to be on target.

Stage 3 has now become even clearer as it clearly suggests a forest environment (although for beginners this could of course be an AOL sketch due to the woody impressions, and what they also wrote out as AOLs). There was also something shiny and metallic, which could point to the wire fence in the picture. But there was no trace for a extraordinary aspect in the target, like a metaphysical dwarf. Such extraordinary content usually attracts the unconscious attention of the viewer, as it does with UFO photos or sessions on exoplanets. The AI ​​at the end: “inconsequential”

 

Viewer # 2

Protocol: TRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2011/01/13
Time: 10.45pm to 11.07pm
Duration: 22 minutes
Pages: 5

The second session was done by a far more experienced viewer. The basic data of the first stages were also in line with the picture here. To shorten the session, the most important aspect of the target was examined directly from Stage 3 (here marked with a [x] in the middle, secondary aspects with [a], [b] and [c]):

Separate detail drawing of the [x] aspect

Stage 4 brought similar AIs, as from the first session: “boring – strange – stupid” . EIs were in the [x] aspect no one to determine, from which one could probably conclude that it is not a living object. Also interesting are the ITs “stand – nature” .

Finally, in Stage 6 , the structure of the [x] aspect was inspected closer. It came back to the IT “stand” and also unspectacular Ts (tangible things / materials) as “clay” and “wood”. Around the structure, there were also the Ts “meadow” and “area” . As a final AI, the viewer found the target as “boring”.

The detailed sketch of the structure clearly shows that it was an exakt hit. The attached data leads to the conclusion that it is not a living entity or an metaphysical entity, but a static object made of ordinary materials. Note also the AOLs “robot”, and especially “garden gnome”.

 
Summary: After we published the two sessions, the somewhat impressed photographer gave us a photo with a (fairly broken) garden gnome there in the meadows, that has been deliberately photographed in black and white. Would he have admitted it if the sessions had not brought such clear results? In any case, a great example of how Remote Viewing can expose photographic fakes …



German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Monroe Institute: CHEC-Units

Category: Places / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 9475 2145 8522 2475
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-04-21
Time: 11.25 p.m. to 00.20 a.m.
Duration: 55 minutes
Pages: 8

Since my interest in consciousness phenomena (in addition to remote viewing) is mainly in the area of ​​out-of-body experience, I got the following target to see some time ago:

This is a so-called “CHEC-Unit” (controlled holistic environmental chamber), which is used at the Monroe Institute in seminars to support out-of-body experiences and other states of consciousness. These chambers almost completely shield sensory stimuli and are equipped with headphones for Hemi Sync recordings for further support, so that one can fully concentrate on achieving the desired state of consciousness. Here is a video explaining such a chamber:

These chambers are regularly in use, as seminars (like Gateway) are constantly taking place at the Monroe Institute, which are composed of small groups. When looking at this target, it came to very interesting impressions: It was actually a group that was working in these chambers on a common goal, and was supported by some entities. Here is the explanation of the session:

The first stages brought data that matched the chamber itself. It felt like I was in a cramped, rectangular room. But suddenly a kind of “channel” opened up to the upper right, which looked like a short tunnel and simply went through the walls:

CHEC-Unit (S3)

Stage 3 – Impression of the cramped chamber (left) with the tunnel suddenly appearing (right), and unambiguous AIs (… “opens like infinite” … “amazing, baffled” … “arouses curiosity” …).

At the end of the tunnel, I had the impression of a kind of door that was opened, and behind it was something like “colorful infinity” (I can’t put it any other way). Perhaps as if you were stepping out of a narrow airlock into immeasurable space, only that no boundaries or fixed reference points were perceptible here. The impressions were experienced by a group of individuals, of whom my first impression at stage 4 was:

“Group of EIs (emotional impacts) at the lower end – looking euphorically into the imposing – neutral hysteria”

I then examined the term “neutral hysteria” more precisely in stage 6 using a relational diagram, and recognized that the cause of this was “hope”, “open” and “what was impressive above” . At that moment I also noticed the opening of the aforementioned “door” and sketched it.

Then my monitor let me examine how the door was opened. The opening had something to do with the group of individuals (seminar participants?) And was partly caused by them. Now we asked what the other part was, which is also causing it, and the impressions came “Help from outside – powerful, great” . We examined the impression “help from outside” and asked about the intention, whereupon the impressions “benevolent – positive attention – help – enable” came about.

At that moment I also noticed that the help was coming from some highly developed, imposing entities, which more or less helped to open the “door” in both directions. These entities made a very pleasant and sublime impression. A company that you can enjoy through and through (as long as you don’t focus on it, like some ungrounded contemporaries in these areas 😉 ). Then we asked whether the group of individuals (G1) could do this alone, which was answered in the affirmative. On the part of the perceived entities, it was actually only a matter of assistance, and not an unconditional requirement.

Finally, we examined the IT “movement – then shoot in one direction” , which appeared in stage 4. We asked about the intention or the purpose, and I got the impressions “brighten – become clear – knowledge – reveal / Aha! -Effect” . Then the session ended with impressive conclusion AIs:

“Transformational”
“Spiritual”

And here again especially for you as an incredibly selfless luxury service; a transcribed (and translated) version of the relational diagrams from stage 6 (since right-brained writing is sometimes hardly legible :D):

CHEC-Unit

Summary:  A very interesting experience, the experience of other states of consciousness, so to speak from “outside”, without having to go out of the body, for example. And another example, which not only the physical world can be viewed, but also that which is normally ascribed to the metaphysical realm and which so far can only be experienced through self-experience. Furthermore, it is a good indication that such processes actually take place in the seminars at the Monroe Institute, and that it is not based on group suggestion or imagination (as poorly informed skeptics sometimes claim). Interesting side aspect: The “door” that appeared in the session was drawn by another viewer exactly like this in a session on a similar topic. Possibly an archetypal symbolism.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Smalltalk with Robert Monroe

Category: People / Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 5541 5436 3046 9415
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-09-27
Time: 12:33 p.m. to 1:21 p.m.
Duration: 48 minutes
Pages: 9

Here again is a small example of the use of “communication” with the target using an interview tool. You can do these “interviews” with virtually any target, but whether you are actually communicating with the consciousness of an individual, or whether it is just a form of information query, has not yet been clarified. In any case, wakeful people usually don’t seem to notice. But there are also rare examples of interactive communication (which one is also “addressed” by the target), especially with non-physical entities. In that case I thought to contact the OoBE pioneer Robert Monroe (passed in 1995) and see what he is doing at the moment. The results were quite interesting … The target formulation was:

“Describe the Consciousness of Robert Monroe at the time of the session and make contact!

In stage 4, the emotional impact in the target was only from a single “person” who had the following sensations: “First look”, “feels connected”, “distance” (AOL/S: like doctor with patient) and “sympathy”.

Stage 4, including emotional impacts (EI)

In stage 6 we then took at the EIs, which we could already assign to a single person, using the “person perception” method. The person is referred to as “P1”. In addition to a funny sketch, the following information came about:

Activity? (what is the person doing?): stands on the edge, does something with his hands, but is careful not to have too much contact with the surface

According to our overall impression, P1 (Robert Monroe) was working on a kind of surface that lay wavy on the floor like molten glass. He seemed to “roll up” something that could be interpreted as information / consciousness work (we have had something like that in other sessions on metaphysical targets). He seemed to be very conscientious about this.

Vocation?: Is unnecessary, is in the middle, be careful, treat something

In the case of the “vocation” it is interesting that you always find out some main premises in (living) people, towards which one is or should be worked towards in the life of this person. In that case, however, it was as if P1 were the vocation itself, and not separate from it in terms of action.

Stage 6 with a (short) perception of people and a funny sketch

When my viewer was asked to describe the appearance, he perceived P1 with strangely distorted limbs and body shapes (including very long fingers and misshapen chest without skeletal structure). I interpreted this as an attempt by P1 to take on a defined form instead of just being undefined energy. In any case, one has to say that the portrayals of people (especially faces) only showed recognizable similarities in 30-50% of the cases. There is still a lot of research into this area.

Of course you could see a certain resemblance if you look at it humorously and caricaturally Lachen

Distorted perception, provisionally formed astral body, or a preferred appearance?

Finally, the most important part of this session; the interview:

V = Viewer
P1 = Robert Monroe (presumably)

V: We greet you! Do you feel like it and have time for a conversation?
P1: Actually busy right now, apologizes for distraction (on the side is ok)
V: Where are you now? Can you give me an impression
P1: (Viewer sensation: “P1 throws pictures around!”) Smooth, uneven surface that you are not allowed to step on – the horizon is fully visible (AOL/S: Like desert)
V: What is your current job there?
P1: Something like foil rolls up
V: If you should have time later …
P1: Happy, change
V: … Can you try to give a sign in our dreams or in some other way that you consciously had this conversation with us?
P1: Yes, but conditions must be right on my part (P1).
V: Thank you for contacting us, and I’ll see you!
P1: Like acquaintance who shakes hands

Obviously P1 is busy at the moment with an important, for us incomprehensible task (energetic?), But is open to cooperation if the conditions (“have time”?) Are right for it. We have been paying attention to our dreams since the session and will provide updates if something goes wrong.

A more in-depth, research-related purpose of this concern is to find out whether conscious communication actually took place, or whether we are only calling up information and P1 does not notice anything about it. A reaction would be an indication that P1 actually noticed something. One could try something like this with living people, for example, when they are in a state between wakefulness and sleep or while dreaming. Allegedly, some people would have already had telepathic messages, mind-reading experiences or contacts with the deceased, which is usually overlaid in the waking consciousness.

Finally, my viewer wrote down his overall emotional impression (AI – how do you like it?):

AI: Hi buddy! Known as work place Not 100% in the matter Amused / neglected

Summary: A content-wise unexpected, but sympathetic and relaxed session result on the current consciousness of the probably greatest OoBe pioneer of modern times. However, it also somehow suits him … Sehr glücklich

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

The Lilith-Entity

In connection with the topic “Lilith”, which was dealt with in depth in another forum a few months ago, Bazur and I did a remote viewing session on this very entity or energy. Although we clearly stated that we did not make any claims to the accuracy or correct interpretation of the data, our session results were not wanted by the administration there and were ultimately even deleted. For this reason, I will leave out the context and the exact target formulation here, as I respect the wish (as irrational as it may seem). I’m going to publish the essence of the session here because otherwise it would be a shame about all the work we have done for it. Maybe someone can do something with it…

So here are just the raw data with a couple of neutral explanations of our impressions:

Bazur was my viewer, who of course was blindly aimed at the target. The target task was as follows (an addition relating to the forum mentioned above has been removed):

“Describe the entity “Lilith” that appeared in connection with the […] forum and make contact!”

Let us now turn to the contents of the session. First the statistical data:

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 5287 7386 5722 6494
Number of viewers: 1
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012-04-18
Time: 00.11h to 01.17h
Duration: 66 minutes
Pages: 10

From now on to the actual course of the session:
Already in stage 1 (ideogram – first approach to the target) there was a flood of data. In addition to the usual sensory impressions, some interesting AIs (the viewers emotional impressions about the target) came to light:

AI (on about half of the ideogram): jumped like level changed
AI (at the end of stage 1): balance to imbalance

In stage 2, the sensory impressions were further specified. The AI ​​in the end: As if something is waiting, arriving

In stage 3, the viewer sketches its first, rough impressions of the target. A kind of tunnel emerged here through which something is conducted (information / energy?). But the tunnel is still partly unfinished, like a construction site. Suddenly a “foreign body” shot through this tunnel construct and partially destroyed it again. This process didn’t seem to be a one-off. At first I thought of a twisting mechanism that should disrupt the true flow of data, but I didn’t want to jump to conclusions (as a monitor you keep that to yourself until the end). Here is the stage 3 sketch:

The AI ​​of stage 3 referred above all to the named “foreign body”, which caught Bazur’s attention: Chaotic, strong, foreign body

After that, we went to stage 4. From stage 4 onwards, it only really becomes concrete in the remote viewing protocol, because the previous levels are only used to approach the target. In addition to a summary of the most important, sensory impressions and dimensional data (the tunnel construct reappeared), other AIs appeared here: “romms”, chaotic, strange

Then we looked to see if there were foreign emotions (EIs) in the target. This is the general indicator of the existence of any kind of consciousness. Bazur immediately described strong impressions: anger, liberated, satisfied

The ITs were also interesting (functions – “What does the target do? What is it for? What is it for?”). There the following impressions came up: keeping in shape, speed, insulating, transporting, control, order, dissolving compact

The final AI for stage 4 was: Feeling like a prison break , rescue / revenge measure

We then went straight to stage 6 , where I instructed Bazur to examine the EIs (foreign emotions) that had emerged. These were deciphered as follows:

Anger:
suppressed,
observed,
reticent
it holds back for a long time, but the inability of others upset

Liberated (by what means ?): You are not allowed to take any
losses
into
your own hands

Satisfied (why?):
Keep
vengeance prove injustice to oneself

Injustice:
underestimating
lack of appreciation
not taken seriously
it’s right and says it, but no one listens

Here we are getting closer to the matter. One issue is slowly emerging. Immediately afterwards I had Bazur make a personal perception of the “person” (P1) in the target to whom the EIs belonged. I asked various aspects, starting with the current job:

Activity:
Is torn from linen
suggests something one
rips

Then I had the appearance of the “person” described:

Appearance:
variable stature
rather masculine (to be understood energetically), but like a child – gender aspect does not matter
pronounced forehead
“bundles of joy” cheeks
large, light blue eyes (crazy look)
bundled hair (reminiscent of Rasta)

I then also asked Bazur to draw the person’s perceived face:

The somewhat strange facial features and hair that reminded of worms or tentacles are the most noticeable features. They reminded a bit of the Medusa myth, where there seem to be overlaps with the Lilith myth. But I’m not that versed in mythology.

Next I had the mental abilities described:

Mental abilities:
Dual output
sucks in from below, changes, and gives out above

In this case, rather abstract perceptions, apparently from the energetic abilities of P1.

Now I had the character described:

Character:
dichotomy
“adapter” – gives in what is incompatible, makes it form-fitting / neutral / systemically
warm core
likeable

A fact that is problematic for P1 was shown visually:

As if several “channels” were necessary for the smooth fulfillment of tasks, but all but one of them are blocked. This makes the process slow and tedious.

Finally, I let Bazur describe P1’s calling:

Vocation:
adapter

There only the “adapter” aspect appeared again. Apparently in the sense that information is to be transformed / adapted and brought into a correct form.

Now I wanted to know exactly, and as the final tool in this session I started an “interview” with P1:

V = Viewer ( Bazur )
P1 = Target person ( “Lilith” )
AI = Own emotional impression / conclusion

Italics added here for a better understanding.

V: Hello, we would like to ask you a few questions. Do you have the time and inclination?
P1: P1 pulls me towards him (dizziness, extremely out of phase).
V: What is your current task in relation to the target environment? (Target environment = “censored” forum / community)
P1: I don’t like your density.


V: Why don’t you like the density?
P1: It should repel itself (or it should be in motion). (Forum Community) works against nature. (Example: Magnetic balls should repel each other!)
V: How can we change that, that the balls fit together ?
P1: There is no center, but a ring.

V: Why is it not a ball?
P1: The link to the environment would be disturbed. Not natural, split off, artificial = imagination / illusion.
V: What makes……… (answers from P1 came so quickly that V couldn’t keep up with the writing) (… where does the problem arise?)
P1: wishful thinking, hope, too little mass to understand.

V: What is the end goal of your current assignment?
P1: Chaos, incentive to reassemble, hint (hint through the chaos / giving an incentive to rethink / reassemble something)
P1: The rules according to which it is built are misunderstood.
V: Please brake! (Flow of information too fast)
P1: pool too small (capacity too small => target)
V: Quite possible, I understand that (throws in the monitor, so wingman)
P1: Calms down, slows down speed.
V: Thank you, we take note of the information. We try to make something constructive out of it.
P1: Gently / lovingly pushes me (viewer) away from you again.

AI: P1 is relatively sober. Not playful, but very loving.
AI: Is informative – I have to sort it.

 

Summary: So that was our session and contact with “Lilith”. I would like to keep my conclusion relatively short: In my impression, the function of the “Lilith” energy is to destroy false conceptual constructs and beliefs so that the “recipients” (i.e. the people, in this case the Community) are forced to put their existing information together in a new and neutral way. It could be symbolized as if something made of porcelain had shattered, people found it and put it together incorrectly (due to wrong ideas). Now Lilith smashes it again so that people have to put it back together. But this time as it corresponds to its true form. Perhaps also an analogy to the first dinosaur finds, which were put together incorrectly and the remains of mythical creatures were interpreted from them.

The point here is to neutralize errors, self-projections and unquestioned beliefs. Basically, to set something to zero in order to (more objectively) recognize it anew. Or expressed in dual terms; to reconcile the mind and rationality with intuition and newly opening “channels” (some would call it “heart connection”), and not to let one distort the other. One may assign these aspects here in the duality to the male and female principle, but perhaps one should not interpret it too figuratively, otherwise one narrows the horizon. In my opinion, what has been demonized are primarily “interfaces to knowledge”, which are archaically associated with the “female principle”. Just that what goes beyond pure “binary thinking” ordoes not deal exclusively with the physical causalities (i.e. the principles that are more masculine). The connection to the source / remembering, so to speak. But it could well be that I still have a very incomplete picture of it.

The overall essence could probably be paraphrased as follows:
“Certainties through self-awareness, instead of stagnation through beliefs.”

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Baltic Sea Anomaly (Ocean-X)

Category: Archeology
Number of viewers: 4
Number of sessions: 4

I’ve sent four viewers to the mysterious circular structure in the Baltic Sea. All sessions were conducted up to Stage 6. A few background information on the subject can be found here (in german language):

grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Schatzsucher finden mysteriöse Kreisstruktur am Grunde der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Mysteriöse Kreisstruktur am Grund der Ostsee wird aus der Nähe erforscht
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Neue Informationen über das mysteriöse Objekt in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Weitere Informationen und Ankündigung neuer “unglaublicher Aufnahmen” des mysteriösen Objekts in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Neue Bilder vom mysteriösen Objekt in der Ostsee
grenz|wissenschaft-aktuell – Mysteriöses Objekt am Ostseegrund: Neuigkeiten aus der Tiefe
The Ocean Explorer (Website des Ocean X-Teams)

Target:

 

Viewer #1

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/14
Time: 2: 21pm to 3:14pm
Duration: 53 minutes
Pages: 8

This session took place just before the first dive photos of the Baltic Sea Anomaly were published. Perceptible was the circular structure, which could be more or less differentiated from the surrounding seabed. It also showed something like a hollow funnel and crags that were either on the object, or inside the object (or both). In the properties of these tips, or the whole object itself came out something like “chemical processes”, and “temperature fluctuations” (eg clear cold inside the structure). Also, a sense of “radiation” has been felt, but it is not clear whether it is thermal or radioactive radiation (or something else).

First, sketched impressions of the viewer in Stage 3. The compulsory data of Stage 1 and 2 (colors, surfaces, etc …) already fit well with the published photos . The viewer has subsequently labeled the sketches for readability:

Later, we examined the structure in detail after moving the viewer slightly outside of it to see if he perceived the seabed around it. A funnel-like structure in the interior came into view:

Here is the impression again in cross-section, with the perception of the above-mentioned “lace” inside. The viewer also perceived a kind of circulation, which is also drawn:

Now one of the “tips” in detail. It showed a kind of flow or circulation inside. Whether it is water, radiation or another form of energy, it is unclear:

In the end, we also investigated several options for the target via the action line. Essentially it came out that the structure was used by a group for the extraction of something:

Summary: In a single session on such targets, of course, not much can be said. But apparently the viewer was on target, and generated some essential data that would later become interesting for comparison purposes.


Viewer # 2

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/24
Time: 7.34pm to 8.11pm
Duration: 37 minutes
Pages: 6

This time a circle structure was percieved again, but it looked much more artificial than in the previous session. But the viewer always had the impressions “artificial and natural”. Interesting or were box-shaped, arranged around the circle structures that looked hollow. Again, a funnel-like structure appeared, which seemed to lead us nowhere (we did not find anything down there, also no ground). In addition, there is a slight pull there, but not so strong that he could suck a human (that’s what the viewer felt). And in the funnel itself it is considerably colder than it is outside.

After the viewer first appeared somewhere in the murky water, and did not notice anything from the actual target, I did a movement command. He was already able to perceive the first impressions of the circular structure:

In Stage 6 , we took a close look at all the impressions collected since the movement exercise. This is how the funnel-shaped structure appeared, around which box-like objects appeared to be arranged. These acted hollow and tinny on the viewer, serving as a kind of container. In the funnel-shaped structure below it seemed to go in deep and cold. Here, the viewer also took the said suction, but which would not be strong enough to pull a man.

Summary: Here, after initial navigation difficulties, very interesting detail impressions were delivered from the target. Especially the aspect of the “funnel” came across quite clearly here. Compared to the first session, a picture of a circulating process or exchange (of whatever kind) is beginning to appear rather intentional than natural (at least in its original purpose). But that should be specified.


Viewer # 3

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/27
Time: 10.11am to 11.03am
Duration: 52 minutes
Pages: 7

The viewer had an immediately strong target contact, and hardly needed to be moved around in the target area to generate the information sought. Like the two previous viewers, the viewer here also perceived a circular structure on the ground, and also noticed very clearly that it is in the water. Already in Stage 1 she drew this first, rough impression of the target:

In Stage 3, the viewer then very clearly got the impression of a round structure on the bottom of a liquid, cloudy medium. Some surface details were already revealed. Only the size estimate (70cm) was still deceptive, but later she noticed that it looks much bigger (see below). Interestingly, she also found the target “lost”:

Finally, in Stage 6 , we focused completely on the structure and made it as detailed as possible:

The viewer almost saw the object as a house or dwelling, except that it was metallic in appearance. It showed something like well-kept rivets and angular structures on the outside, as well as a kind of opening or hatch on top (top picture). There was also something on the side, which could have been a door or an entrance. Then I let her look inside the structure (bottom picture), which she found very unusual. They look like a strangely upholstered and cozy environment made up of exotic, cleverly designed and constructed structures. The structure seemed to have a deeper meaning.

When we investigated the purpose of this structure and the object itself, it first came out that it originally had a different function, but now serves as a “shelter” for any living thing. We looked at the creatures for a moment, and they looked worm-like or snakelike, which might indicate marine animals (eels, worms …) now living in, around, or below (the actual interior did not seem to be filled with water). But of course we also wanted to know the original purpose of the object.

When we did this, the following came out (quote):

What was the original function?

– Emit something, serve to tap or draw energy
– One puts oneself in, and lets it work on itself
– Inside, it’s like something magnetic; It’s supposed to strike you when you get in the act
– Energy flow, as if all your polarities align themselves

In the context of today’s “purpose”, it still came out that it was the “last source” of this species, and the creatures living in it (animals?) are there because of it, want to have to do. In any case, this impression indicates that you would feel energetically well-tempered inside the structure.

Then I let the viewer do a spontaneous scaling to find the approximate size of the object. The Ocean X team goes from 60m (~197ft), if I remember correctly. Here is the result of the viewer (~ 65m or ~213ft):

Then I had a timeline done to find out the approximate age or timing of the genesis (which, mind you, is not always reliable, it’s not always as literal as a yardstick, because “pinching” can also occur). The impression was “a few hundred years” , which fits one of the previous sessions. We roughly measured it to 1300 AD. But only under reserve, because at the moment we had problems with our Skype connection (which can bring out a viewer strongly).

Below, I let the viewer again make a summary sketch in plan view and side view. As a final AI (emotional conclusion) she had “makes me curious – something secret inside” . Then we finished the session.

Summary: One could now speculate from this detailed session that it is a kind of forgotten / lost technology, which was used for energetic purposes (see pyramid energy and the like). But from Baltic volcanism to ancient secret knowledge it would be a big jump. It also shows why it is so important to make several sessions on such “mystery” targets, as each viewer looks at individual aspects of the target (depending on the interest of the subconscious), and only a lot of impressions make an evaluation possible.

 

Viewer # 4

Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Date: 2012/06/28
Time: 9.17pm to 9.46pm
Duration: 29 minutes
Pages: 6

This viewer got the same target but with new coordinates (because the monitor did not have the old target at the time):

Here as well, the first stages showed similar data as in the previous three sessions. In Stage 3 , the target was again drawn very clearly, this time with seabed:

In Stage 4 , the AOLs “Mars” and “Baltic Anomaly” appeared, which hopefully did not affect the other data. The viewer found something exciting, which was then examined in detail in Stage 6 . This turned out to be the round structure on the seabed. It was perceived as “smooth” and “artificial”. As AOL came at the point “Land Mine”:

A movement command was performed that centered the viewer on the actual target. The structure was clearly perceived as artificial here:

The ITs showed the aspects “observation” and “measure”. The viewer also had the impression “not for people”. Furthermore, he had as AI “Maybe someday someone will come, and wait for that”. In addition, the viewer mentioned that he felt like under water.

Summary:
Here you were on Target, because the circular structure was clearly hit again.
The mandatory dates and sketches are very much in line with the other sessions. The impressions from Stage 6 are to be interpreted with some reservations, since the AOL “Baltic Sea anomaly” already occurred in Stage 4. To what extent the viewer could solve it, I do not know. But in any case, it is another verification that there actually exists a circular structure on the bottom of the baltic sea, which is unusual.


Preliminary overall summary:

The Baltic Sea Anomaly proved to be quite persistent target. From the sheer quantity of data, it could go in the direction of an ancient building that had a certain energetic (perhaps technological) function. As interpretations there is, for example, a kind of power place or device for energy healing, or a temple that had more ideal or informal value. Strangely enough, our timelines to date point to a time between the early and early Middle Ages, which makes the position of the object puzzling. Because at that time there should already have been water there (in contrast to the ice age, for example). If there are more usable session results, the project will be updated …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Remote Viewing Angels

Category: Consciousness
Protocol: CRV (with monitor)
Coordinates: 97 08 16 1000 01
Number of viewers: 1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012/02/05
Time: 3.11pm to 4.30pm
Duration: 79 minutes
Pages: 11

I’ve been conducting this target during my RV training (as the only “Mystery” target besides normal training targets). It is part of a research project that has been running for some time and has produced similar results so far. The target formulation was:

“The angels – their most important tasks and the opportunity to get help from them.”

Stages 1 and 2 were quite unspectacular. Stage 3 showed a shadowy scenario in which a frightening life-form cowered somewhere and a much larger life-form approached (AOLs such as “Animal Enclosure” or “Animal Photographer” came up).

In Stage 4, we came closer to the cause by the emotional impacts (from two different creatures).

Impressions in Stage 4

Sensory impressions (S): Small hollowed out, red, blue, yellow, bushy, pointed
Dimensional impressions (D): tall, narrow, rounded, higher than wide, towering,
Aesthetic Impression (AI): Free, wide, calm, clear
Emotional Impact (EI): Fearful, Excited, Shocked, Unprepared [1] – Watching, a little excited, relaxed [2]
Tangibles (T): What high, round, thin
Intangibles (IT): Fencing and capturing, emulating

AI (emotional conclusion of the viewer): “Trivial, what is that?”

In Stage 6, we then tried to break down the situation in more detail. We called the small, cowering life form L1, and the great life form L2. L1 reacted to L2. The L2-being acted on me like a kind of upright, very large statue, which was supposed to radiate “impressiveness” (light, gray, white, standing there, handling something, hands rounded to the body, seems to attract something). The task of L2 seemed to be to capture and pull L1. As further data on L2 came “thinks weird / narrowed, irascible, looking down, picking up, higher presence”.

Now I should do a movement exercise to “follow” L2. It felt like this statuesque L2 was just a kind of placeholder or avatar for something else. But the way to the origin of L2 seemed strange, because in the midst of it a kind of “phase shift”, which I perceived only as an “infinity aspect”. It did not only act like a spatial distance, but also like a change of planes.

There was a first, felt stop that led me further to a life form I called L3. L3 looked like a gray-yellow curved or round structure. But that, too, just felt like a placeholder or a representation.

We decided to move on until we came across the “real” L3 (or the source of previous representations).

After we skipped a last placeholder, which strangely acted like two upright tubes, I came in touch with the original L3. It looked very distant like a human figure, but on closer inspection it looked more like a hollow sphere with a thin membrane and yellowish, spaghetti-like energy structures inside. In addition, there seemed to be an opening through which energy flows. I gave the statement “incomprehensible for my frame”.

Now I should have an interview with L3:

V = viewer (me)
L3 = L3 ()

(Own additions or explanations to non-verbal processes in italics)

V: Hello!
L3: Attention
V: Sorry, we would like to know something.
L3: Reserved, does not really want to
V: We would like to help you. What do you do?
L3: Attention, becomes open
V: Request for information (what L3 is doing)
L3: Push some kind of gray wrapping to me and want to bring me in / welcome
V: Can not go now, but we’d like to know what happens when you do that.
L3: It opens something in L3, to pick up or integrate
V: Sense of the action?
L3: Add and store in (head area)
V: Will that ever happen?
L3: No (L3 seems disappointed)
V: Prerequisite for this?
L3: Should be more appropriate
V: What does “matching” mean?
L3: Rolling together, shaping (i’m getting the picture of a rolled-up substance)


V: Procedure to make us (humans) compatible?
L3: understanding. Open up to it.
V: Physiological consequences?
L3: becoming thinner and bony (perceive the image of what is thin, gray, bony – apparently “bones” are meant)

V: Would it be desirable for me?
L3: Yes
V: Is there a timeline for this?
L3: Growth, collect (living beings), group (Age: Aeon / ~ 1000 years)
V: What is the end purpose of your activity?
L3: Keep expanding until I dissolve.
V: What happens after dissolution?
L3: Being distributed, transformation, individual parts spread out in a targeted manner, and are inserted / inserted in different places – parts are then in place and thus widen their observation radius. (AOL: Sun)

V: Do you have colleagues?
L3: Yes
V: How many?
L3: Dozens
V: Are there any who do something else?
L3: Also other directions.
V: Thanks a lot, see you soon!
L3: Merry bye.

AI: I’m back here
AI: Interesting


Summary:
An interesting session on an unusual target.
I interpret the situation as follows: We witnessed how a nonphysical entity (“Angel”) wanted to capture and apprehend a frightened, stuck “soul”. It seems to be the normal occupation of this entity. The interview also featured interesting, non-verbal impressions, such as “curling in to make more appropriate”, which seems to fit some of Robert Monroe’s descriptions of his communication with nonphysical entities (information / energy in the right shape). “to make them compatible”). In addition, the bizarre impression of “bones” when we asked about the physiological consequences so that it could be “suitable”. It only became clear to me after the session that actually bones could have been meant.

Apparently, there are not too many of these forms of consciousness, and they each perform specific tasks that are fixed. Personally, I found them to be sociable and enjoyable, albeit somewhat biased (which presumably dictates the task). You could put them in the “lightful” category, while the more colorful and polarizing aspects of how humans make them seem to be missing. But they obviously carry out their “craft” competently. Before this mutates into a product review, I conclude with the conclusion: Pleasant, if somewhat pale / one-sided contemporaries with important tasks in the universe. I like to say hello again if they cross my path …

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Mysterious Sounds in the Sky

Category: Phaenomena
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 7452 9456 7885 6316
Number of viewers: 1 (Benny Pamp)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 2012/01/24
Time: N/A
Duration: N/A
Pages: 7

The target was this video from Belgium with the mysterious sky noise:


The target formulation was:

“Describe the booming sound heard in the video, its cause and purpose!” (With video URL)

The target was processed by Benny to stage 6. As a first impression, I would say the following about our results:

It was most likely not a fake, in the sense of a subsequently built-in noise. There was no such intention, and the incoming data was so powerful and amazing for the viewer that it would not fit a fake. Feeling deeper into the AIs also revealed no negative aspects (in the sense of HAARP, Bluebeam or the like). It seemed rather to be a very sublime and pure consciousness (apparently non-human, or at least not categorizable) that produced these effects for a particular purpose.

The purpose included aspects such as “cleanse” (which should be replaced by warm / cold wet cold water), “occupy” (which “belongs to”, but no structural / physical premises) and “leave an impression”. The latter included the aspects of “imprint”, “education” and “pointing in the right direction”). In describing the entity doing this (“by whom?”), Aspects such as “feminine,” “wise,” “delicate,” and “nonhuman, because so perfect,” came. If I had to guess , I would come up with “Gaia” or “Earth Consciousness”. But that only purely hypothetical, otherwise I will not do justice to the “neutrality” that I expect from myself. Fool

Here are some interesting details from the session …

In Stage 3 , an interior spatiality with windows and an outdoor area can be interpreted (like the environment in the video):

The source of the noise has been clearly identified and marked with an [x] (this is done for a later detailed investigation of this aspect). The aspect “wet cold” is also interesting because it was rainy in the video outside. A closer examination of the cause of the noise made it rather abstract. Benny drew the following sketch:

There was a “vibration” in the noise source, which apparently took place in a spatial but non-material environment (at least there were no surfaces to touch, but that could be in the air). On closer inspection, a shiny, golden ball appeared. It seemed to be the center of the whole thing:

In the following Stage 4, detailed aspects of the target were queried in tabular form:

Finally, Stage 6 with the Relational tool, which in this case was used on Stage 4 terms that we wanted to explore more closely:

The underlined terms from Stage 4 were examined. In the last box (middle right), I asked Benny to spontaneously draw the person / entity that made it all up. But it was, as I said, not really tangible / categorizable, but only a kind of indefinable, impressive consciousness. See also final AIs in Stage 4 at the end:

“I’m lost for words”
“Everything I write is absolutely meant”
“Love (caring sense), security”
“Wet cold (unintentionally carry along)”
“Awesome!”


Summary: It was a very impressive session (for the viewer). Of course, since it was just a single session, we can not be fully sure about the true nature of the target. Of course, there is still the possibility of getting into some AULs, and the target is actually a well-made fake. But the AIs are remarkable here.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Viewing a non-physical Construct

Category: Consciousness
Protocol:
CRV (Solo)
Coordinates:
384516789
Number of viewers:
1 (Stefan Franke)
Number of sessions:
1
Date:
2011-10-17
Time:
11.25h PM to 12.43 AM
Duration:
78 minutes
Pages:
9

This was an experimental target, which was created by a friend of mine (here called Phrenorium). It is a non-physical construct that he visualizes, manifests, and expands over time in meditative states. His intention was to obtain a kind of verification of the “authenticity” of his construct by means of RV, ie, whether other people could perceive or visit it extra-sensually. Here is his own description, which he gave me after the session:

You have been in an astral world created by me that has been increasing in stability for years due to interaction on my part. The world has now become quite complex, and 1-2 years ago I then decided to materialize out of my head into a real sphere outside of this dimension so that “living things” can nest there. Anyway, I’ve send you to a mountainous area with a cave … I can also do a sketch for you. Anyway, from this cave you have a perfect and sublime impression of most of my astral world. I enjoy this view more often…

The TARGET ITSELF is the heart of my world or one of many. It is a special type of “etheric generator” that has been installed to keep the world stable and upright without my intervention. It consists of a spherical crystal, usually in the color light blue when activated by me, sometimes in purple (to tie my consciousness there, which allows me deeper impressions) this sphere is mounted on a long bright obelisk-like rod, which approximately 1.40 is big (then comes the sphere about it). The room itself is just a cave in these mountains.

He also drew the following sketches:

Sketch of the cave (Target)
Sketch of the overall world


And now for my session:

My session consisted of a standard procedure up to stage 4 (Stage 1 twice), a closer look at [x], [a] and [b.] Aspects, and a stage 6 relational diagram on one of the target properties. At the end I tried an analytical sketch of the overall impression and made a conclusion.


Impressions of Stage 2

Colors: red, yellow, neon green, dark, black, light blue
Textures: smooth, rounded, round, indented
Smells: stale, stuffy
Tastes: artificial, a bit metallic (partly)
Temperatures: cold
Sounds: buzzing, artificial
Dimensions: broad, low, hilly, subdivided, inside

AOL: Electricity


Impressions of Stage 3

AI: complex
AI: technically
AI: could be an astral form!

Although the impressions appeared rather physical at first, I had a feeling that I knew more likely from metaphysical targets (consciousness, emotions, etc …). They were already “solid” structures, but somehow different (more volatile?) than within physical targets.

My main interest now fell on three components of the scenario, which I examined again individually with [x], [a] and [b]. But before that, I made a stage 4 on the target in general:


Impressions of stage 4

Sensory impressions (S): gloss, glassy, ​​light gray, light blue, rounded, smooth, dark
Dimensional impressions (D): narrow, far in, flat, low, subdivided
Aesthetic Impressions (AI): interesting, unusual, sophisticated
Emotional Impact (EI): looking down from above, enjoying the view
Tangibles: (T): different, subdivided, upright structures on surface, dark
Intangibles (IT): move, guide, systematics, functional areas

AOL: computer mainboard
AOL / S: Like a big hall
AI: functional
AI: complex
AI: combined


Stage 2 Impressions [x]

Textures: smooth, thin, tinny, hard
Colors: yellow, green, dark gray, shine
Smells: metallic, alkaline
Tastes: metallic, bitter
Temperatures: normal, warm
Sounds: hum, hiss
Dimensions: rounded, wrapped, partially hollow, covered

 

AOL: copper
AOL: battery
AOL: capacitor
IT: charged
AI: interesting
AI: seems like a specific function

Impressions of stage 6 [x] (per relational diagram) on the term “specific function”:

Specific function -> What does it do?
Picking up, guiding inwards, handing it over somewhere

Somewhere -> Where to?
Down, pedestal, pipe, or in the ground

What for?
Filling, pouring, substrate (?)

Note: The word “substrate” came to mind spontaneously, without me knowing what it meant at the moment. Something like that happens to me rarely when viewing. By definition, a substrate can be a foundation for something, such as to enable or sustain something. The object studied with [x], according to Phrenorium, serves as a kind of “etheric generator” that automatically keeps its non-physical construct stable, even when it is not working on it, or paying attention to it.


Impressions of Stage 2 [a]

Textures: rounded, thin, recessed
Colors: red, blue, silver, yellow-green
Smells: warm, neutral
Tastes: neutral
Temperatures: normal
Sounds:
Dimensions: rectangular, rounded, indented

AOL / S: like a ring
AOL: moon landing (came to me there spontaneously)
IT: holding something, readiness, just unused
AI. meets its purpose

This seems to be the circular area around the etheric generator (see sketch), but I perceived this element separately. I even had the impression that it was stuck in the air, but unfortunately rejected it without writing it down because it seemed too absurd.


Impressions of Stage 2 [b]

Textures: long, thin, aspiring, hollow
Colors: green, yellowish, striped
Smells: unidentified
Tastes: neutral, strawy (not really)
Temperatures: warm, dry
Sounds: rustling
Dimensions: high, long, branched

AOL: cablesalad
AOL: dry plant
T: plastic
IT: connect, support
AI: casual, secondary

This aspect may fit the forest that is present in the construct. However, this is outside the cave, so not in the immediate target area. But I did not seem to have been attracted to the aspects that I found interesting in the area because of the lack of exercise.


Overall sketch:


An attempt to reassemble the individual aspects in position.


Conclusion: The target resembles complex, artificial structures on an equipped area. These structures have different functions. They do not do much for itself. They contribute something. Like a complex technology. Could be a circuit board. But they are unusually dark, and high / far. Maybe very big. Could also be thought forms / astral constructs!

Etheric Generator - Comparison

The session shows that it is indeed possible to view non-physical or metaphysical realities and specific functions inside it. However, they also seem to have some consistency or manifestation through repeated “charging” in order to get accurate data.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag

Venera spacecraft on the planet Venus

Category: Astronomy
Protocol: CRV (with monitor via Skype)
Coordinates: 1524-3997
Number of viewers: 1 (Christian Rotz)
Number of sessions: 1
Date: 02/02/2011
Time: 12.11pm to 12.32pm
Duration: 21 minutes
Pages: 5

This target was based on a color image of the landing probe of one of the russian Venera spacecrafts. They survived only briefly in the inhospitable Venus atmosphere (official data: almost 500°C heat, almost 100 bar air pressure and sulfuric acid clouds). It was a short session from our early days in Remote Viewing.

Venera Probe - Target

The target was processed until Stage 4. It included a separate processing on a single aspect ([x]), and two movement exercises (one for centering, and one from 50m above the target). Here are the most interesting excerpts and aspects of the session:

Stage 2 Impressions

Colors: white, light, black, gloss, yellow
Textures: Soft, hard, yielding, dry
Smells: Artificial, rubbery, plastic
Tastes: Artificial
Temperatures: cool, fresh
Sounds: hum
Dimensions: flat, leveled, tall, far, floating


Stage 2 Impressions [x]

Surfaces: cool, hard, wet
Colors: gray, white, dark
Smells: Artificial, rubbery
Tastes: soft
Temperatures: cool
Sounds: noise, crackling
Dimensions: flat, wide, angular, shallow, upright

Venera Probe - Sketch 1
Sketch after movement exercise 50m above the target


Stage 4 Impressions [x]

Sensory impressions (S): soft, dry, yielding, grainy, mushy
Dimensional impressions (D): outside, wide, heavy
Aesthetic Impression (AI): disorder, useful, endure
Emotional Impact (EI): difficult, coping, concern, intolerance
Intangibles (IT): protection, damage

AI (emotional conclusion of the viewer): “I don’t want to be there!”

Venera Probe - Sketch 2Spontaneous sketch after Stage 4 with impressions of the environment. Low hills or dunes are to be guessed.

Venera Probe - Sketch 3

More detailed sketch, were we can guess the Venera landing probe on the right side. In addition, there is a movement aspect which may refer to the landing approach.

I would like to emphasize above all the emotional impressions (EI) in Stage 4, which can be understood as foreign emotions on the target. Interestingly enough, these are in keeping with the general mood that prevailed in mission control at that time around this part of the mission (since the probes, as we said at the beginning, quickly became inoperative and one could be glad to get any data from them at all). At least that is more plausible at first sight than that there were any living beings on the Venus surface who felt these complex emotions. In that case, one could even speculate that the probe acted as a kind of “avatar” for the emotions and impressions of the ground crew on Earth who controlled it. Other Venus sessions that have since been made, but were targeted away from the landing probe, did not show any EIs in the local environment (which is really rare when you’re used to targets on Earth).

Venera (CGI)

Another peculiar aspect is the descriptions of “cool” in the temperatures. According to official measurements, the Venus surface is around 480-500 °C. Only the interior of the probe was initially cooled to below 0° C, so it worked for a short time at all. However, the absence of heat is already noticeable. It must be said, however, that a viewer in such sensory individual aspects can also be wrong (apparently often in colors and temperatures).

Several sessions with different viewers on the same target would perhaps provide even more differentiated results of the individual impressions. But apart from the temperature aspect (unless it’s really cooler there and the temperature measurements are flawed), the session is amazingly accurate.

Update 10/10/2012: In the meantime, such unexpected temperature sensations have also been revealed during sessions on other planets or other extreme environments, which are sometimes described as inappropriate, but sometimes also suitable (eg “freezing cold” in space, “as in a furnace” on the sun, “like in a steel mill” in other Venus sessions). It is still unclear what these different sensations are, but perhaps it has to do with the extraordinary temperature conditions in such targets, which are simply beyond the usual temperature sensations of humans (like with hot steam or dry ice one sometimes cann not tell if it is hot or cold).

Summary: An interesting single session on the planet Venus, which confirmed well known facts, but also offered unexpected aspects.

German Flag German version of this article German Flag